Allowed

Pushkar Singh @ Pushkar Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC15 May 2026CR. MISC./30238/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought bail in a case involving IPC Sections 399, 402, 120-B and Arms Act offences. The State opposed the application. The Court allowed the bail petition subject to the petitioner furnishing bail bonds and residing in Haryana with specific attendance conditions.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted subject to furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of like amount and compliance with residence and attendance conditions.

Pushkar Singh @ Pushkar Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2026)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30238 of 2026

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-63 Year-2023 Thana- PIPRAKOTHI District- East Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Pushkar Singh @ Pushkar Kumar Singh S/o Bipin Bihari Singh R/o villBangari, PS- Pipra Kothi, District- East Champaran

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar

¶7

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Ms. Sagrika, Advocate Mr.Aditya Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Vinod Shanker Modi, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR

¶8

ORAL ORDER

¶9

2 15-05-2026

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶11

APP for the State.

¶12

2 . The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Piprakothi P.S. Case No. 63 of 2023 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 399, 402, 120-B of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1-D) 25 [1-(1-A)], 25(1-AA), 26, 35 of the Arms Act.

¶13

3 . As per the prosecution case, criminals had assembled to plan a loot. One country made pistol and one live cartridge was recovered from one Kunal Kumar Singh. Petitioner is one of the criminals who is said to have fled away from the spot when the police raided.

¶14

4 . The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30238 of 2026(2) dt.15-05-2026 2/3

¶16

the petitioner is in custody since 02.11.2023. He further submits that petitioner will give an undertaking in the Court below that he will not involve himself in any criminal case after being released on bail. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner will not stay in Bihar and he will stay in Haryana.

¶17

5 . The learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the bail application of the petitioner.

¶18

6 . Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this application is allowed.

¶19

7 . Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Addl. Sessions Judge-19, East Champaran at Motihari in connection with Piprakothi P.S. Case No. 63 of 2023.

¶20

8 . The petitioner after grant of bail will stay at the following address-

¶21

House :- Room No. 1318/01, Jawahar Colony, near V.M. School Senior Secondary.

¶22

Owner name :- Mrs. Shobha Devi Police Station :- Saran District :- Faridabad State :- Haryana

¶23

9 . The petitioner will also mark his attendance at the

¶24

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30238 of 2026(2) dt.15-05-2026 3/3

¶25

Saran Police Station, Faridabad, Haryana on the first and third Sunday of each month. Any default in appearance at the Police Station would be result in cancellation of bail bonds of the petitioner.

¶26

10 . The petitioner will visit Bihar only on the date fixed in the trial Court in which he is an accused and is required to visit the Court. Before leaving State of Haryana, the petitioner will inform the local police station about the case and the date and the period for which he is going to stay in Bihar to attend the cases.

¶27

11 . Let a copy of this order be communicated to the Senior Superintendent of Police / Superintendent of Police, Faridabad, Haryana through FAX for its compliance forthwith.

¶28

(Sandeep Kumar, J)

¶29

tusharika/-

¶30

U T

Pushkar Singh @ Pushkar Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pushkar Singh @ Pushkar Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr. Md. Irfanuzzoha Vs The State of Bihar

Panna Lal Kumar @ Pana Lal Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Prakash Kumar Choudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Dinesh Choudhary @ Dinesh Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Shiv Mangal Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Abhishek Kumar @ Abhishek Kumar Hindu Vs The State of Bihar