Badari Prasad @ Badri Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29430 of 2026

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-62 Year-2026 Thana- GOVINDPUR District- Nawada

======================================================

Badari Prasad @ Badri Prasad S/o Late Yamuna Prasad @ Jamuna Prasad Resident of Village - Bari Gulni, P.S. - Pakaribarwan, District - Nawada

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Akhilesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Anuj Kumar Shrivastava, APP

¶11

======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 06-05-2026

¶14

Heard Mr. Akhilesh Kumar, learned counsel

¶15

appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Anuj Kumar Shrivastava, learned APP for the State.

¶16

The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in connection

¶17

with Govindpur P.S. Case No. 62 of 2026 registered for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶18

As per the allegation made in the FIR, 5.950 litres of illicit liquor was recovered from a motorcycle bearing Registration No.BR27T9477.

¶19

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. Admittedly, at the time of the alleged seizure and recovery of illicit liquor, petitioner was

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29430 of 2026(2) dt.06-05-2026 2/3

¶21

not present and he has been made accused in this case, being the owner of the motorcycle in question, which was given by the petitioner to his villager in good faith and the same was being driven by him at the time of said incidence and as such the petitioner had no idea that he was carrying liquor on the said motorcycle. Petitioner has clean antecedent.

¶22

Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail.

¶23

Having heard the rival submissions made on behalf of the parties, as well as, having perused the allegation made in the FIR I find that the petitioner has clean antecedent and he is the owner of the motorcycle. He was not found at the place of occurrence. The State too has failed to implement its liquor policy in its true spirit. I am of the opinion that petitioner has, prima facie, made out a case to be released on pre-arrest bail.

¶24

The petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on pre-arrest bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned District Court within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Concerned Court where the case is

¶25

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29430 of 2026(2) dt.06-05-2026 3/3

¶26

pending in connection with Govindpur P.S. Case No. 62 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

¶27

The learned District Court is directed to verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and if it is found that the petitioner is involved in some other cases, as what has been stated in paragraph no.3 of the bail application, this order will automatically lose its force.

¶28

(Purnendu Singh, J)

¶29

Sanjay/-

Badari Prasad @ Badri Prasad v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Badari Prasad @ Badri Prasad v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pramod Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Santu Singh @ Manish Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sirjan Yadav @ Brija Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Jitendra Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Umesh Roy @ Umesh Ray Vs The State of Bihar

Arun Mandal Vs The State of Bihar