Dismissed¶18

Raju Nat @ Raju Nut v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC7 May 2026CR. MISC./27453/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail rejected; Patna High Court; CRL.M.C. No.27453 of 2026; Sandeep Kumar, J; Dariyapur P.S. Case No. 441 of 2025, Saran; Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Ss. 108(1), 109, 61(2), 111, 3(5); shooting/gun allegation; informant eyewitness identification; custody since 16.07.2025; six criminal antecedents; prima facie material; gravity of offence; observations not to influence trial.

What did the court decide?

Prima facie material exists against the petitioner indicating his involvement in the commission of the offence. ¶16

Raju Nat @ Raju Nut Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27453 of 2026

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-441 Year-2025 Thana- DARIYAPUR District- Saran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Raju Nat @ Raju Nut S/o- Late Tuna Nat @ Dhuna Nut Village - Porai, P. S - Dariapur, District - Chapra

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Hemant Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajendra Nath Jha For the Informant : Mr. Arvind Kumar, Advocate Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 07-05-2026

¶11

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶12

2 . The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Dariyapur P.S. Case No. 441 of 2025 registered for the offence under Sections 108(1), 109, 61(2), 111 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

¶13

3 . As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is alleged to have shot at the deceased. Out of the two persons who fired the bullets, the informant identified one of them as the petitioner. There is a specific allegation that the petitioner shot the deceased with a gun.

¶14

4 . The petitioner is in custody since 16.07.2025 and has six criminal antecedents. The allegations against the

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27453 of 2026(2) dt.07-05-2026 2/2

¶16

petitioner are serious and grave in nature. There exists prima facie material against the petitioner indicating his involvement in the commission of the offence.

¶17

5 . Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, the nature and gravity of the offence, as well as the criminal antecedents of the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner.

¶18

6 . Accordingly, this application for regular bail stands rejected.

¶19

7 . It is made clear that any observation made herein is prima facie in nature and limited solely for the purpose of adjudication of the present bail application. Such observations shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case and shall not influence the trial or any other proceedings in any manner.

¶20

Shishir/-

¶21

U T

¶22

(Sandeep Kumar, J)

Raju Nat @ Raju Nut v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raju Nat @ Raju Nut v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manu Kumar @ Abhimanyu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Satish Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sonu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Megho Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Jaiky Yadav @ Jaiki Prasad Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Rohit Kumar @ Amit Vs The State Of Bihar