Aman Kumar @ Ranjan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

In the present case, the petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bachhwara P.S. Case No. 348 of 2024 registered for the alleged offences under Sections 115(2), 127(1), 109, 3(5) of BNS and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

¶17

As per prosecution case, the petitioner and other co-accused persons assaulted the informant and when the informant opposed, this petitioner hit on his head with the butt of pistol causing its fracture. Sometime thereafter, on the same day, the petitioner and other co-accused persons attacked the house of the informant and resorted to firing and one such shot hit to the minor nephew of the informant on his head.

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25589 of 2026(2) dt.17-04-2026 2/3

¶19

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Only specific allegation against the petitioner is that he is said to have hit the informant on his head with the butt of his pistol but no injury report of the informant has been brought on record. From the allegation made in the FIR, it is apparent that there was no intention to cause death of any person, however, no injury has been caused. Even the nephew of the informant received simple injury and the allegation for causing injury is non-specific. The petitioner is having antecedent of two cases and in both the cases he is on bail. The petitioner is in custody since 22.01.2026 and charge sheet has been submitted.

¶20

Learned APP opposes the submission made on behalf of the petitioner. Learned APP submits that the specific allegation against the petitioner is of assaulting the informant on his head with the butt of the pistol.

¶21

Having regard to the facts and circumstances and submissions made on behalf of the parties and considering the nature of allegation against the petitioner, period of custody and submission of charge sheet, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount

¶22

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25589 of 2026(2) dt.17-04-2026 3/3

¶23

each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai/concerned Court in connection with Bachhwara P.S. Case No. 348 of 2024, subject to the conditions mentioned in Section 480(3) of B.N.S.S. and also the following conditions :

¶24

(i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner.

¶25

(ii) The petitioner will remain present on each and every date fixed by the court below.

¶26

(iii) In case of absence on three consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of the petitioner will be liable to be cancelled by the court concerned.

¶27

(Arun Kumar Jha, J)

¶28

DKS/-

¶29

U T

Aman Kumar @ Ranjan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Aman Kumar @ Ranjan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manoj Yadav @ Manoj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Harishankar Dubey @ Bhola Dubey Vs The State of Bihar

Arun Kumar Mehta @ Arun Mehta @ Arun Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Hafiz Ansari Vs The State of Bihar

Golu Kumar @ Ayush @ Ayush Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Pankaj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar