Dismissed

Sampat Kumar @ Vikki @ Bikky v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC5 Jan 2026CR. MISC./2484/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court dismissed a Criminal Miscellaneous application filed by four accused persons seeking quashing of a discharge order. The court held the application was infructuous because charges had already been framed in the trial court, changing the stage of the case.

What did the court decide?

The Criminal Miscellaneous application for quashing of discharge order was dismissed as infructuous.

Sampat Kumar @ Vikki @ Bikky Vs The State of Bihar — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Patna HC (2026)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2484 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-73 Year-2019 Thana- INDUSTRIAL District- Bhagalpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Sampat Kumar @ Vikki @ Bikky Son of Late Shankar Prasad Singh Resident of Village- Bahadurpur, PS- Zero Mile, District- Bhagalpur

¶5

Shiv Kumar @ City Son of Late Shankar Prasad Singh Resident of VillageBahadurpur, PS- Zero Mile, District- Bhagalpur

¶6

Rahul Kumar Son of Sanjeev Kumar Resident of Village- Koriyama, PSJanipur, District- Patna

¶7

Kashinath @ Kashinath Ram Son of Dalbadar Ram Resident of VillageRani Talav, Asstt. Professor Bhagalpur Engineering College, P.S.- Industrial Area, Distt.- Bhagalpur

¶8

... ... Petitioner/s

¶9

Versus

¶10

The State of Bihar

¶11

Mukesh Kumar Son of Suresh Prasad Singh Resident of Bahadurpur, P.S.Industrial Area, Distt.- Bhagalpur (Bihar)

¶12

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶13

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kamal Kishore Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Choubey Jawahar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA

¶14

ORAL ORDER

¶15

4 05-01-2026 Heard Mr. Kamal Kishore Sinha, learned counsel for the

¶16

petitioners and Mr. Choubey Jawahar, learned counsel for the State.

¶17

The present application has been filed for quashing of the discharge order dated 13.11.2024 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-XVII, Bhagalpur in S.T. Case No. 405 of 2024 arising out of Industrial Area PS Case No. 73 of 2019 registered for the offences under Sections 341, 323, 307,

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2484 of 2025(4) dt.05-01-2026 2/2

¶19

379, 504 & 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶20

Learned counsel for the petitioner has very fairly submitted that charges have been framed in the Court below and as such, the stage of the case has been changed.

¶21

In these circumstances, this application is dismissed as

¶22

having become infructuous.

¶23

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)

¶24

Raj Kishore/- U T

Sampat Kumar @ Vikki @ Bikky v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sampat Kumar @ Vikki @ Bikky v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jay Prakash Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Kundan Kumar Halwai Vs The State of Bihar

Himanshu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Madhuri Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Renu Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Sujit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar