Ravi Ranjan Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and allegation is of recovery of 20 litres of liquor from a motorcycle and 20 litres of liquor from cattle house of Mintu.

¶18

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and even alleged recovery is from house of Mintu with whom he has no relation but then is a friend and he came to be implicated based on the

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24606 of 2026(2) dt.18-04-2026 2/3

¶20

fact that he is owner of the seized motorcycle. It is next submitted that no prudent person would use his own vehicle for committing an occurrence and thus would create evidence against himself and hence would get implicated, it is further submitted that petitioner was completely unaware that Mintu would misuse the vehicle in the manner as alleged, who was also apprehended from the spot.

¶21

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

¶22

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on Provisional anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 500/- (Rupees Five Hundred) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Dehri (T) P.S. Case No. 953/2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

¶23

It is made clear that thereafter the learned Trial Court shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the event if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of even one case then it would be presumed that petitioner, for the

¶24

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24606 of 2026(2) dt.18-04-2026 3/3

¶25

purposes of seeking anticipatory bail, had concealed his antecedent before this Court, as such, the provisional anticipatory bail order shall not be confirmed, but after verification if it is found that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent in that event the provisional anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith.

¶26

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

¶27

amit/-

¶28

U T

Ravi Ranjan Paswan v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ravi Ranjan Paswan v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Muslim @ Mohd. Muslim Vs The State of Bihar

Ajay Ray Vs The State of Bihar

Rahul kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Krishna Mandal @ Kanhaiya Mandal Vs The State of Bihar

Shankar Mukhiya Vs The State of Bihar

Rakesh Kumar Tiwari @ Mantoon Tiwari @ Mantoon Baba Vs The State of Bihar