Ramu Ram Vs The State of Bihar

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar Pandey, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Indu Kumari Srivastava, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 16-04-2026

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

¶13

learned A.P.P for the State.

¶14

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bakhtiyarpur P.S. Case No. 50 of 2026 dated 24.01.2026 registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶15

The allegation is of recovery of 160 litres country made liquor from an abandoned dilapidated house where the petitioner has been arrested.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. It is submitted that nothing has been recovered from conscious possession of the petitioner, rather, the said

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24117 of 2026(2) dt.16-04-2026 2/3

¶18

recovery was made from an abandoned dilapidated house. The petitioner has no concern with the said house. It is further submitted that the search and seizure has been prepared in violation of Section 103/105 of the B.N.S.S.. The petitioner is in custody since 25.01.2026, having no criminal antecedent and charge-sheet has been submitted in the case.

¶19

Learned A.P.P for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

¶20

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Exclusive Special Judge, Excise, Barh, District-Patna in connection with Bakhtiyarpur P.S. Case No. 50 of 2026, subject to the following conditions:-

¶21

Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

¶22

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24117 of 2026(2) dt.16-04-2026 3/3

¶23

One of the bailors will be his own blood relation, preferably father, mother, brother, sister and or his wife.

¶24

The bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is made accused in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of misuse.

¶25

If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶26

(Khatim Reza, J)

¶27

prabhat/-

¶28

U T

Ramu Ram v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramu Ram v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashutosh Kumar Rai Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Om Prakash Singh Vs The Jai Prakash University Chapra

Ram Chandra Rai and Anr. Vs Lal Babu Rai and Ors.

Md. Ali Kousar @ Sabdar @ Sabdal Vs The State of Bihar

Dharmendra Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Ravi Kumar Vs The State of Bihar