Parmanand Maraiya Vs The State of Bihar

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Md Musowir For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Nazir Ansari ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 22-04-2026

¶12

Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶13

This application, for grant of anticipatory bail,

¶14

arises out of Barari Police Station Case No. 36 of 2026, disclosing offences under Sections 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶15

As per the prosecution case, on 07.02.2026, police conducted a raid at Sohra Tola, Jagdishpur based on secret information about illegal liquor sale by Parmanand Maraiya/petitioner. The accused fled from the spot. His identity was confirmed by a local ward member. During search of his house, 60 liters of illicit country-made liquor were recovered.

¶16

Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24076 of 2026(2) dt.22-04-2026 2/3

¶18

present case. No recovery of illicit liquor has been made from his conscious possession, and the alleged premises does not belong to him. Petitioner has been made accused solely on the basis of disclosure made by a Panchayat Ward Member, who, due to prior and political enmity arising out of the forthcoming Panchayat elections, has falsely named the petitioner. Petitioner is having no criminal antecedent.

¶19

After having heard learned Counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the fact that from seizure list it is apparent that illicit liquor has been recovered from the house of the petitioner as such prima facie offence under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 is made out and the Hon’ble Full Bench of this Court has held that anticipatory bail in such cases in not maintainable. Accordingly, in view of the law laid down by the Full Bench in Criminal Appeal (SJ) No. 431 of 2019, I am not inclined to grant the petitioner privilege of anticipatory bail.

¶20

However, if the petitioner surrenders within a period of four weeks from today and seeks regular bail, the concerned District Court may decide the same on the same date keeping in view that the petitioner is having no criminal antecedent.

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24076 of 2026(2) dt.22-04-2026 3/3

¶22

This application is, accordingly, rejected.

¶23

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J)

¶24

HarshPandey/-

¶25

U T

Parmanand Maraiya v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Parmanand Maraiya v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shatrughan Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

Naushad Ahamad @ Naushad Ahamad Ansari @ Naushad Alam @ Naushad Ahmad Vs The State of Bihar

Usha Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Pancham Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sandeep Manjhi Vs The State Of Bihar

Ram Ayodhya Sah Vs The State of Bihar