Fudan Mian Vs The State of Bihar

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22796 of 2026

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-64 Year-2025 Thana- SUHAIL District- Gaya

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Fudan Mian son of Late Nanku Mian Resident of Village- Pakari, P.S.Suhail, District- Gaya,

¶5

Anwar Mian @ Anwar Ansari son of Fudan Mian Resident of VillagePakari, P.S.- Suhail, District- Gaya,

¶6

Golu Mian @ Amsher @ Mohammad Amsher son of Fudan Mian Resident of Village- Pakari, P.S.- Suhail, District- Gaya,

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶11

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gajendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Narendra Kumar Singh, APP

¶12

======================================================

¶13

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY ORAL ORDER

¶14

3 01-07-2026

¶15

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

¶16

APP for the State.

¶17

The petitioners seek bail in anticipation of their arrest in connection with Suhail P.S. Case No. 64 of 2025 instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 76, 118, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

¶18

As per the prosecution case, allegation against the petitioners is that they along with other accused persons came there and started fighting with the informant and other family members and thereafter petitioner no. 1 assaulted the husband of

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22796 of 2026(3) dt.01-07-2026 2/4

¶20

the informant with Garasa hitting him on his left leg and then other co-accused persons assaulted Kasim Miyan causing injury in his eye.

¶21

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated however no occurrence, as alleged, had taken place. It has further been submitted that there is case and counter case for the same offence and one Suhail P.S. Case No. 65 of 2025 was lodged from the side of the petitioners. The learned counsel for the petitioners has drawn the attention of this Court towards Annexure-P/3, whereby the injury reports of the injured persons have been brought on record and from perusal of the same all the injuries were found to be simple in nature. It has next been submitted that the petitioners have clean antecedents.

¶22

Learned APP appearing on behalf of the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

¶23

Considering the facts aforesaid, the petitioners are directed to be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, on their furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the

¶24

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22796 of 2026(3) dt.01-07-2026 3/4

¶25

satisfaction of the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sherghati, Gaya in connection with Suhail P.S. Case No. 64 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 of the BNSS and subject to the following conditions:-

¶26

(i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners and the other shall be a local resident:

¶27

(ii) the petitioners will remain physically present on each and every date fixed by the Court below, if so required by the learned Trial Court and shall cooperate in the investigation;

¶28

(iii) in case of absence on two consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bonds of the petitioners will liable to be cancelled by the Court concerned;

¶29

(iv) the Court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioners and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioners have concealed their criminal antecedents, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bonds of the petitioners. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of the same on in the name of verification.

¶30

(v) If the petitioners, in future, is found to be involved in similar nature of offence, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of their bail bonds.

¶31

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22796 of 2026(3) dt.01-07-2026 4/4

¶32

It is made clear that the observations, if any, made

¶33

in this order, shall be of no bearing during the trial.

¶34

(Sourendra Pandey, J)

¶35

krishna/-

¶36

U T

Fudan Mian v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Fudan Mian v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kaushal Kishor Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Neeraj Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Ganga Dayal Sah Vs Mostt. Dhana Devi

Mala Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Birbal Mukhiya @ Birbal Bin Vs The State of Bihar

Sonu Kumar Soni Vs The State of Bihar