Narayan Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nagendra Prasad, APP ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶12

4 13-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

¶13

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Triveniganj P.S. Case No. 321 of 2025 dated 22.06.2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(2), 303(2), 118(1), 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.

¶14

The prosecution case, in brief, is that on 21.06.2025 at about 8:00 A.M., while the informant was constructing his house, the accused persons allegedly arrived armed with deadly weapons, damaged the construction, abused and assaulted the informant and his son, causing head injuries. It is further alleged

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22789 of 2026(4) dt.13-07-2026 2/4

¶16

that they also snatched Rs. 5,000/- from the informant and a gold and silver chain from his son before fleeing the place of occurrence.

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in the present case. It is next submitted that there is a case and counter case between the parties for the same and similar incident which is said to have taken place on 21.06.2025 in which both the parties have sustained injuries. Counsel for the petitioners further submits that the injuries which have been found on the person of Arvind Yadav, Sunil Kumar Yadav and Ramkrishna Yadav have been found to be simple in nature though caused by hard and blunt substance. However, without admitting the guilt of the petitioners, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that they are ready to pay a sum of Rs. 10,000/- to the informant as financial assistance towards the injuries alleged to have been caused by them. Counsel for the petitioners further undertakes that the petitioners will not repeat the same offence in future if released on anticipatory bail and will also maintain cordial relationship with the Informant and his family members.

¶18

On the other hand, the learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioners.

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22789 of 2026(4) dt.13-07-2026 3/4

¶20

Having heard learned counsel for the petitioners and considering that there is a case and counter case between the parties for the same and similar incident and the injuries caused to the injured have been found to be simple in nature, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate I, Supaul in connection with Triveniganj P.S. Case No. 321 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. as well as the following conditions;

¶21

(i) The petitioners will pay Rs. 10,000/- to the Informant at the time of furnishing bail bonds;

¶22

(ii) One of the bailors should be the family member/relative/known of the petitioner(s) who shall provide official document / personal affidavit to show his/her bona fide;

¶23

(iii) the petitioner(s) shall appear on each and every date before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of their bail bond by the Trial Court itself;

¶24

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22789 of 2026(4) dt.13-07-2026 4/4

¶25

(iv) the petitioner(s) shall in no way try to induce or promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds.

¶26

(Ajit Kumar, J)

¶27

rishi/-

¶28

U T

Narayan Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Narayan Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajan Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Lalji Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Devendra Nath Puri Vs The State of Bihar

Dr. (Smt) Shashi Prabha Vs The State of Bihar and Ors.

Abhishek Prashar Vs The State of Bihar

Raja Raman Kumar Vs The State of Bihar