Disposed

Kailash Rai v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC3 Apr 2026CR. MISC./21755/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Correction of an anticipatory bail order: petitioner's father's name and the sections of the FIR were misstated due to inadvertence. The court corrected both entries in the earlier order and granted four weeks' time to surrender.

What did the court decide?

Father's name and FIR sections corrected in the order dated 22.12.2025; four weeks' time granted to surrender before the court concerned.

Kailash Rai Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2026)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21755 of 2026

¶2

¶3

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.89157 of 2025

¶4

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-6 Year-2013 Thana- RAGHOPUR District- Vaishali

¶5

======================================================

¶6

Kailash Rai S/o Ramanand Rai @ Ram Nandan, Resident of VillageSukumarpur, Dakshini Tola, PO- Rustampur, Dist.- Vaishali, Present R/o Kila road, Patna City, P.S.- Chowk, Dist.- Patna

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sweety Sinha, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shantanu Kumar, A.P.P. ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 03-04-2026

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶14

A.P.P. For the State.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that vide order dated 22.12.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No.89157 of 2025, the petitioner was granted anticipatory bail but due to inadvertence in the array of parties the father’s name of petitioner has been mentioned as “Ramanand Rai” whereas the father’s name of petitioner is “Ramanand Rai @ Ram Nandan” and in paragraph no.2 of the said bail application, the Sections in which F.I.R. was registered is mentioned as “Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act” instead of “Sections 272, 273, 308 of the I.P.C. and Section 47(A) of the Bihar Prohibition

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21755 of 2026(2) dt.03-04-2026 2/2

¶17

and Excise Act”, therefore, the same may be corrected.

¶18

In view of the submission made on behalf of learned counsel for the petitioner, let the father’s name of petitioner is directed to be corrected as “Ramanand Rai @ Ram Nandan” instead of “Ramanand Rai” and in paragraph no.2 the Sections in which F.I.R. was registered be corrected as “Sections 272, 273, 308 of the I.P.C. and Section 47(A) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act” instead of “Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act” in the order dated 22.12.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No.89157 of 2025.

¶19

In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, further four weeks’ time from today is granted to the petitioner to surrender before the Court concerned.

¶20

Accordingly, the order dated 22.12.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No.89157 of 2025, stands modified to the above extent.

¶21

The order passed today shall be part and parcel of the order dated 22.12.2025.

¶22

(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J)

¶23

Ritik/-

¶24

U T

Kailash Rai v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kailash Rai v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Arjun Singh and Ors. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Krishna Ballabh Mishra and Ors. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Vishnu Sanker Pandey Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Deepak Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Rakesh Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Abhishek Kumar @ Abhishek Yadav Vs The State of Bihar