Allowed

Anil Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC17 Apr 2026CR. MISC./21560/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail in a cyber-fraud case arising from recovery of mobiles, SIM cards, laptops and ATM cards from a rented house. Petitioners claimed parity with co-accused already granted bail. Court enlarged both petitioners on bail on furnishing bail bonds.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners enlarged on bail on Rs. 10,000 bond each with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M.-V, Buxar.

Anil Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2026)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21560 of 2026

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-55 Year-2025 Thana- Cyber P.S. District- Buxar

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Anil Kumar Son of Bechu Prasad R/o Village - Barkhi, P.S.- Samshethi, Dist.- Varanasi (Banaras), U.P.

¶5

Rakesh Kumar Jaiswal @ Rajesh Jaiswal Son of Late Satish Chandra R/o Village - Bhadmurganj, P.S.- Bhelupur, Dist.- Varanasi, U.P..

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Virendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Arun Kumar Singh ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 17-04-2026

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

¶14

APP for the State.

¶15

The petitioners have prayed for bail in connection with Buxar Cyber P.S. Case No. 55 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 318(4), 319(2), 336(3), 338, 340(2), 112, 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 66(D) of the I.T. Act as well as Section 9(1) of the Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Act.

¶16

The case of the prosecution, in short, is that on 28.11.2025, police received an information that in a rented house, Anil Kumar Jaiswal and Aman Kumar Jaiswal have called persons from all over Indian and they are indulged in

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21560 of 2026(2) dt.17-04-2026 2/3

¶18

mobile gaming and cyber fraud. On this input, police reached at the rented house and from there, 31 mobile phones, various SIM cards, 4 laptops, 2 wi-fi router, 82 ATMs, 9 passbooks and 5 cheque-books were recovered. It is also alleged that a total of 18 persons were arrested.

¶19

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has submitted that petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. They have been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that the name of the petitioners finds place in the list and from perusal of the seizure list, it will transpire that only a mobile was recovered each from the possession of the petitioners. He further submits that similarly situated other co-accused persons have been granted bail by this court vide Cr. Misc. No. 19112 of 2026. The case of the petitioners stands on similar footing. Moreover, a statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioners have got no criminal antecedent and they are languishing in judicial custody since 30.11.2025.

¶20

The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

¶21

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The above named

¶22

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21560 of 2026(2) dt.17-04-2026 3/3

¶23

petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-V, Buxar in connection with Buxar Cyber P.S. Case No. 55 of 2025.

¶24

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)

¶25

subham/-

¶26

Anil Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anil Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Suraj Vs The State of Bihar

Pramod Thakur Vs The State of Bihar

Mohan Lal Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Gulab Vs The state of Bihar

Umesh Kumar @ Umesh Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Sanni Kumar @ Sunny Kumar Vs The State of Bihar