Karan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21488 of 2026

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-740 Year-2025 Thana- GARDANIBAG District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Karan Kumar S/o Vinod Ram R/o Village - Gardanibagh, P.S - Gardanibagh, District - Patna

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Aryan Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Pronoti Singh, A.P.P. ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 01-04-2026

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

¶12

learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶13

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of one case under the Excise Act and allegation is of recovery of 10.08 litres of liquor from the house of the petitioner and 30.5 litres of liquor from the hosue of Badal Kumar @ Ajay Ram.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not arrested from the spot, as such, nothing was recovered from his conscious possession. It is further submitted that the house in question is a joint family property, as such, it cannot be alleged with certainty that it was the petitioner who

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21488 of 2026(2) dt.01-04-2026 2/3

¶17

had kept the liquor in the house or the liquor kept in the house was within his knowledge and after amendment in the Excise Act in the year 2018, the concept of deemed possession and presumed offender has been done away with.

¶18

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

¶19

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, let the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on provisional anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Gardanibagh P.S. Case No. 740 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C./482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

¶20

However, it is made clear that thereafter the learned Trial Court shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of more than one case, it would be presumed that petitioner had concealed his antecedent before this Court at para 3 of the anticipatory bail application in that event the provisional anticipatory bail order

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21488 of 2026(2) dt.01-04-2026 3/3

¶22

shall not be confirmed but if it is found on verification that petitioner has antecedent of only one case in that event the provisional anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith.

¶23

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

¶24

Kundan/-

¶25

U T

Karan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Karan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanjay Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Rajesh Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Mohan Sahani Vs The State of Bihar

Vicki Kumar Singh @ Krishna Murti Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Puran Prasad Sah @ Puran Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Nurul Haque Vs The State of Bihar