Dismissed¶24

Kanhaiya Chaudhary v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC19 Jun 2026CR. MISC./21369/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail refusal; Patna High Court; CR. MISC. No. 21369 of 2026; Kanhaiya Chaudhary v. The State of Bihar; Bihpur P.S. Case No. 760 of 2022; Sections 307, 302, 120(B)/34 IPC; murder and attempt to murder; boat firing on Sunil Singh at Harun Ghat; custody since 23.05.2023; earlier bail rejected 17.05.2024 (Cr. Misc. No. 12651 of 2024); subsequent application Cr. Misc. No. 5507 of 2026 withdrawn; prosecution evidence closed 24.04.2026; defence evidence closed 15.05.2026; direction for expeditious conclusion of trial; Additional Sessions Judge III, Naugachia; Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma; order dated 19-06-2026.

What did the court decide?

Bail prayer refused; learned trial court directed to expedite and conclude the trial at the earliest. ¶24

Kanhaiya Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2026)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21369 of 2026

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-760 Year-2022 Thana- BIHPUR District- Bhagalpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Kanhaiya Chaudhary Son of Manoj Chaudhary Resident of Village - Sonbarsha, P.S.- Bihpur, District - Bhagalpur (Bihar).

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Krishna Prasad Singh, Sr. Advocate : Mr. Rakesh Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Md. Aslam Ansari, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA

¶10

ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 19-06-2026

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶13

Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶14

Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since

¶15

23.05.2023 in connection with Bihpur P.S. Case No. 760 of 2022 for the offences punishable under Sections 307, 302, 120(B) read with Section 34 of the IPC.

¶16

The case of prosecution in brief is that on 29-122022 at about 12:00 hours the informant and her husband, namely, Sunil Singh and her daughter get on the boat at Harun Ghat to cross Ganga river. At the same time, accused petitioner, namely, Kanhaiya Choudhary and Manoj Choudhary also get on the boat along with three unknown. After crossing the river Ganga when the informant, her husband and her daughter get

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21369 of 2026(3) dt.19-06-2026 2/3

¶18

down from the boat Kanhaiya Choudhary first asked the name from Sunil Singh and thereafter Kanhaiya Choudhary fired upon him after abusing. Informant went towards the village to call covillagers who took the victim Sunil Singh for treatment and in the course of treatment victim Sunil Singh succumbed to death.

¶19

Earlier the bail petition was rejected vide order dated 17.05.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 12651 of 2024 by the Coordinate Bench of this Court, thereafter, the petitioner again moved this Court vide order dated 29.01.2026 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 5507 of 2026 but the same was withdrawn. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody since 23.05.2023 and trial has not been progressed although there is direct and specific allegation against the petitioner in the FIR. Vide order dated 10.04.2026, the report was called for with regard to the stage of the trial. Report dated 20^th May, 2026 of the learned trial court reveals that out of six charge-sheet witnesses, all charge-sheet witnesses have been examined and prosecution witness has been closed on 24.04.2026 itself. After that defence counsel has produced four defence witnesses and defence witness has been closed on 15.05.2026 and now the case is fixed for argument.

¶20

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21369 of 2026(3) dt.19-06-2026 3/3

¶22

State, on the other hand, has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

¶23

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail in connection with Bihpur P.S. Case No. 760 of 2022 pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge III, Naugachia. However, the learned trial court is directed to expedite and conclude the trial at the earliest.

¶24

Prayer is refused.

¶25

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)

¶26

Gaurav Sinha/-

¶27

U T

Kanhaiya Chaudhary v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kanhaiya Chaudhary v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kuldeep Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Nand Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Anish Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Mansur Ansari @ Md. Mansur Ansari Vs The State of Bihar

Mohit Raj @ Romi @ Romio Vs The State of Bihar

Sonu Sahni @ Sonu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar