Allowed¶19

Dipak Kumar @ Dipak Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC26 Mar 2026CR. MISC./20304/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20304 of 2026; Dipak Kumar @ Dipak Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar; regular bail; Ladaniya P.S. Case No. 69 of 2026, District Madhubani; Sections 274 and 275 BNS; Section 30(a) Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act; custody since 21.02.2026; bail bond Rs. 20,000/- with two sureties; Justice Shailendra Singh; decision dated 26-03-2026.

What did the court decide?

Regular bail granted; petitioner enlarged on bail in connection with Ladaniya P.S. Case No. 69 of 2026 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Court concerned. ¶19

Dipak Kumar @ Dipak Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20304 of 2026

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-69 Year-2026 Thana- LADANIA District- Madhubani

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Dipak Kumar @ Dipak Kumar Yadav, S/o- Ram Ashish Yadav @ Ramashish Yadav, R/v- Bishanpur PS- Ladaniya District- Madhubani

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Jitendra Kumar Bharti, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Parmanand Prasad, APP ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 26-03-2026 1. Heard the parties.

¶13

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with

¶14

Ladaniya P. S. Case No. 69 of 2026, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 274 and 275 of the BNS and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶15

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and has been languishing in jail since 21.02.2026 and the main witnesses of the prosecution, who are to be examined in the trial, are government officials, so, at this stage, the release of the petitioner will not adversely affect the prosecution.

¶16

4. Learned APP for the State opposes the bail prayer of the petitioner.

¶17

5. In the facts and circumstances of this case and

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20304 of 2026(2) dt.26-03-2026 2/2

¶19

considering the statements made in the petition as well as above submissions, coupled with the petitioner's fair and clean antecedent, this court is inclined to release him on bail. Accordingly, let the petitioner named-above be enlarged on bail in connection with Ladaniya P. S. Case No. 69 of 2026, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Court concerned.

¶20

(Shailendra Singh, J)

¶21

Rajiv/-

¶22

U T

Dipak Kumar @ Dipak Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dipak Kumar @ Dipak Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shree Kant Singh @ Srikant Singh Vs The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary Revenue and Land Reforms Department

Rupam Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Jagdambi Mandal Vs The State Of Bihar

Manoj Uraon Vs The State of Bihar

Vikash Kumar Sahni @ Vikas Kumar Sahni Vs The State of Bihar

Ram Yadav Vs The State of Bihar