Dismissed¶¶15

Subodh Kumar @ Subodh Paswan v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC8 Apr 2026CR. MISC./19958/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court, Criminal Miscellaneous No. 19958 of 2026 (order dated 08-04-2026, Prabhat Kumar Singh, J): anticipatory bail application of Subodh Kumar @ Subodh Paswan, accused under Sections 147, 341, 323, 324, 307 and 504 IPC in PS Case No. 29 of 2023 (Daudnagar, Aurangabad), rejected on grounds of specific and direct accusation and grievous sword injuries to the informant's brother.

What did the court decide?

Taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case, the specific and direct nature of the accusation and the nature of the injuries allegedly caused by the petitioner, the court rejected the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail. ¶¶15

Subodh Kumar @ Subodh Paswan Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19958 of 2026

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-29 Year-2023 Thana- DAUDNAGAR District- Aurangabad

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Subodh Kumar @ Subodh Paswan Son of Late Nanhak Paswan Resident of Village- Tarari (Ambedkar Nagar), P.S.- Daudnagar, District- Aurangabad

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Sunil Kumar Dubey, Advocate For the State : Mr. Syed Mojibur Rahman, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶9

2 08-04-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.

¶10

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 341, 323, 324, 307 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶11

As per prosecution case, this petitioner is alleged to have assaulted brother of informant with sword.

¶12

It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. As a matter of fact, on account of petty dispute, altercation took place between the parties in which both sides sustained injuries. There is case and counter-case. Petitioner claims clean antecedents.

¶13

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19958 of 2026(2) dt.08-04-2026 2/2

¶14

On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner and submitted that petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and there is specific accusation that this petitioner assaulted brother of informant with sword. Doctor has found the injuries, sustained by the injured, grievous in nature.

¶15

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, specific and direct nature of accusation and nature of injuries allegedly caused by this petitioner, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is rejected.

¶16

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

¶17

shashank/-

Subodh Kumar @ Subodh Paswan v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Subodh Kumar @ Subodh Paswan v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Happy Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Rohit @ Fekan Kumar @ Rohit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ziyaul Ansari @ Jayaullah Ansari Vs The State of Bihar

Manoj Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Pratima Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Kushami devi @ Kusami Devi Vs The State of Bihar