Brajesh Sah @ Brajesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19028 of 2026

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-228 Year-2025 Thana- BHAWANIPUR District- Purnia

======================================================

Brajesh Sah @ Brajesh Kumar Son of Brahamdev Sah @ Varamdev Sah Resident of Village - Mariya More (Maniya More), Ward No.- 6, P.S.- Adarsh Thana Naugachhiya, District - Bhagalpur.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar Bihar

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ashok Kumar Yadav, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Md. Mushtaque Alam, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANSUL ORAL ORDER

¶9

3 04-05-2026

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner Mr.

¶11

Rananjay Kumar and learned APP for the State Mr. Mushtaque Alam.

¶12

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bhawanipur P.S. Case No. 228 of 2025 instituted for the offences under Section 87 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

¶13

The allegation is that the daughter of the informant was kidnapped by the petitioner and he had sold the lady in Rajasthan. His daughter informed him about the same. She informed that she was with one Jitendra Joshi at Chitaur. Her statement was recorded and she levelled allegation that Brajesh Sah (petitioner) gave her something to eat. Thereafter, she

¶14

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19028 of 2026(3) dt.04-05-2026 2/3

¶15

became unconscious. Brajesh Sah forced her to marry a person named Jitendra Joshi who took her to Rajasthan. She stated that Jitendra Joshi used to keep her properly.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. The petitioner is in custody since 16.11.2025 and has got no criminal antecedent.

¶17

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

¶18

The lady seems to have made clearl allegation of kidnapping against the petitioner. However, her statement would show that the person Jitendra Kumar to whom she was married was keeping her properly. The petitioner bears no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 16.11.2025, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

¶19

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.F.C. Purnea/concerned Court in connection with Bhawanipur P.S. Case No. 228 of 2025.

¶20

It is made clear that any observation made herein is prima facie in nature and limited solely for the purpose of

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19028 of 2026(3) dt.04-05-2026 3/3

¶22

adjudication of the present bail application. Such observations shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case and shall not influence the trial or any other proceedings in any manner.

¶23

(Ansul, J)

¶24

abhishekkr/-

¶25

U T

Brajesh Sah @ Brajesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Brajesh Sah @ Brajesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mantu Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Rakesh Kumar @ Pintu Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Umesh Prasad Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

Gourav Priyadarshi Vs The State of Bihar

Ananya Jain Vs The State of Bihar

Rakhi Kumari @ Nikki Vs The State of Bihar