Petitioners sought modification of an anticipatory bail order to extend the time for surrender after the stipulated period expired. The court declined, holding it will not extend surrender periods where the accused failed to surrender in time or seek modification beforehand, and rejected the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18079 of 2026
In
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.90244 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1103 Year-2025 Thana- SAHARSA SADAR District- Saharsa
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Nafisu Zzoha For the Opposite Party/s : Ms.Anita Kumari ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
ORAL ORDER
learned APP for the State.
accordingly.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
vikash/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the period stipulated for surrender under an earlier anticipatory bail order should be extended where the accused neither surrendered in time nor filed a modification application before expiry
Pravin Kumar
Munai Lal Sah @ Munga Sah @ Munga Lal Sah
The State of Bihar
Satyavrat Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
