Kanhaiya Lal Kesari Vs The State of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17799 of 2025

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-13930 Year-2022 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPatna

======================================================

Kanhaiya Lal Kesari S/o Prahlad Prasad R/o Patliputra Industrial Area, Patliputra Colony, P.S.- Patliputra, Distt.- Patna

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar

¶8

Vijay Kumar Yadav S/o Yamuna Prasad Yadav R/o 174, Grand Apartment, Frazer Road, P.s.- Kotwali, Distt.- Patna

¶9

Shyamal Kishore Jha S/o (not known), R/o - 174, Grand apartment, Fraser, Road, Patna, P.S. Kotwali, Dist.- Patna

¶10

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjay Kumar Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Navin Kr. Pandey, APP ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶12

7 07-01-2026

¶13

Heard the parties.

¶14

The petitioner is named in the complaint case and

¶15

apprehending his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 13930C of 2022 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 418 and 420 of Indian Penal Code.

¶16

The allegation against petitioner is not to return Rs. 10 lakh which was taken as a loan from complainant in terms of agreement dated 12.04.2018.

¶17

At the outset, it would be appropriate to point out

¶18

that aforesaid agreement was not disputed either by learned

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17799 of 2025(7) dt.07-01-2026 2/3

¶20

counsel for the petitioner or learned counsel for the complainant / O.P. No. 2 particularly in view of the fact that the signature of complainant/ O.P. No. 2 is missing over there.

¶21

It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that disputes is civil in nature for which the present criminal case is completely un-occasioned and unwarranted as the clause-7 of agreement dated 12.04.2018, speaks in itself that how Rs. 10 lakh can be recovered from petitioner in case he fails to return the same. However, a cheque of Rs. 10 lakh dated 16.09.2019 was also given to complainant as security, as drawn from for “Andhra Bank” bearing no. “000106”. While concluding argument, it is submitted that petitioner is a man of clean antecedent.

¶22

Aforesaid factual submissions and the clause as incorporated in agreement itself as submitted aforesaid could not disputed by learned counsel for the informant/ O.P. No. 2.

¶23

In view of aforesaid factual submission and by taking note of fact as the disputes primarily civil in nature, where the mode of return already decided by parties

¶24

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17799 of 2025(7) dt.07-01-2026 3/3

¶25

themselves, accordingly petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks, is directed to be released on bail, furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Patna /concerned Court, where the case is pending in connection with Complaint Case No. 13930C of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C/ Section 482(2) of BNSS.

¶26

(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J)

¶27

Sudha/-

¶28

U T

Kanhaiya Lal Kesari v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kanhaiya Lal Kesari v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chandan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Krishna Prasad @ Krishna Prasad Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Ambuj Amrit Vs The State of Bihar

Abhay Kumar @ Abhay Kumar Guddu Vs The State of Bihar

Gauri Shankar Jha Vs The State of Bihar

Sangita Kumari Vs The State of Bihar