Sunil Kumar @ Sunil Mukhiya Vs The State of Bihar

with Daudnagar P.S. Case No. 567 of 2025 dated 30.08.2025 registered under Section 303(2), 317(2) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 4, 21 of Mines and Minerals ( Development and Regulation) Act, 1957.

¶18

As per the F.I.R. on 30.08.2025 at about 2:30 P.M.

¶19

the informant with the Police force raided a sand ghat at Purna Bigha near Sone river and on seeing the Police party the driver of a tractor tried to flee away but the tractor was intercepted upon which about 100 CFT of sand extracted illegally from the ghat was loaded and was seized by the Police. It has further

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1659 of 2026(4) dt.05-05-2026 2/3

¶21

been alleged that the Police inquired from the arrested person about the storage of the sand near the ghat having about 10,000 Cubic Feet upon which the informant was informed that storage of the sand was done by the petitioner.

¶22

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is neither the owner of the tractor nor the driver. The driver who was driving the tractor was having no connection with the petitioner. 100 CFT of illegally mined sand was kept on the tractor and the petitioner had no knowledge about the storage of the sand near the ghat. The name of the petitioner has transpired on the basis of disclosure of his name by the arrested co-accused i.e. driver of the tractor owned by one Ramautar Kumar having no connection with the petitioner. It is not the case of prosecution that storage of illegally mined sand was kept in the warehouse belonging to the petitioner or the land owned by him or taken on lease by the petitioner. The petitioner is having no criminal antecedent.

¶23

On the other hand, learned counsel for the Mines and Minerals Department opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail and submits that the name of the petitioner was disclosed by the arrested co-accused i.e. driver of the tractor on whose vehicle 100 CFT of illegally extracted sand was found and

¶24

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1659 of 2026(4) dt.05-05-2026 3/3

¶25

seized. The storage of 10,000 CFT near the ghat of Sone river was made by the petitioner.

¶26

Regard being had to the submission made by the parties, taking into consideration the fact that 10,000/- CFT of sand was kept near the river ghat which is an open space accessible to everyone, the name of the petitioner has been disclosed by the arrested co-accused and the petitioner is having no criminal antecedent, accordingly, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶27

Let the petitioner, above named, be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of SDJM, Daudnagar, District- Aurangabad in connection with Daudnagar P.S. Case No. 567 of 2025 subject to the condition as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the B.N.S.S. 2023.

¶28

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J)

¶29

praful/-

Sunil Kumar @ Sunil Mukhiya v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sunil Kumar @ Sunil Mukhiya v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Parmatma Kumar @ Parmatma Sao Vs The State of Bihar

Ashish Kumar @ Ashik Singh @ Ashik Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sanjiv Kumar Singh @ Sanjiv Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Prince Kumar Yadav @ Eta @ Prince Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sudhir Kumar @ Sudhir Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

Hari Shankar Sah @ Hari Shankar Prasad Vs The State of Bihar