Rakesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of one case and allegation is of recovery of 121.5 litres of liquor concealed under heap of straw of three accused persons, out of which, 40 litres of liquor alleged to have been recovered from heap of straw concealed in Khalihan of petitoiner and 1.5 litres of liquor from house of petitioner. It is next submitted that petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and khalihan is a place outside the house and thus is

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16447 of 2026(2) dt.17-03-2026 2/3

¶18

accessible to villagers at large as such it appears that someone inimical to the family concealed meager amount of liquor with an intent to implicate the entire family. It is next submitted that no prudent person would use his own premises for committing an occurrence and thus would create evidence against himself and hence would get implicated. It is also submitted that the house in question is a joint family property as such it cannot be alleged with certainty that it was petitioner, who had kept the liquor in the house or the liquor kept in the house was within his knowledge and after amendment in the Excise Act in the year 2018, the concept of deemed possession and presumed offender has been done away with and he came to be implicated based on confessional statement of Gauri Devi, his sister-in-law with whom the family of the petitioner is on an inimical term.

¶19

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

¶20

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on provisional anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.5000/- (Rupees five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16447 of 2026(2) dt.17-03-2026 3/3

¶22

learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Bhagwanganj P.S. Case No.8/2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

¶23

It is made clear that the learned trial court thereafter shall verify the criminal antecedents of the petitioner and in the event if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of more than one case, in that event, it would be presumed that petitioner had concealed his antecedent before this court, as such, the provisional anticipatory bail order shall not be confirmed but if on verification it is found that petitioner has antecedent of one case, in that event the provisional anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith.

¶24

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

¶25

amit/-

¶26

U T

Rakesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rakesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mithilesh Kumar @ Chandan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sameer Rai Vs The State Of Bihar

Raghuveer Sahni Vs The State of Bihar

Anshu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Nitish Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sunil Rai Vs The State of Bihar