Modification application in a criminal matter was not entertained in view of the statutory bar under Section 403 of BNSS; petitioner was left to pursue any appropriate remedy available under law and the application was consigned to record.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15246 of 2026
In
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69580 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-635 Year-2023 Thana- SIWAN CITY District- Siwan
======================================================
Rampravesh Yadav @ Pahalwan son of Udaybhan Yadav R/o VillageSakarapar, P.S.- Lar, Dist- Deoria, UP
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Saket Tiwary, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ajit Kumar, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER
2 13-03-2026 In view of the bar contained in Section 403 of
BNSS, the petitioner may avail appropriate remedy in accordance with law.
consigned.
(Purnendu Singh, J)
Niraj/-
U T
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rampravesh Yadav @ Pahalwan son of Udaybhan Yadav
The State of Bihar
Purnendu Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
