Disposed¶14

Ramjivan @ Ramjivan Kumar @ Ramjivan Kumar Paswan v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC11 Mar 2026CR. MISC./15222/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Keywords: anticipatory bail; criminal antecedents; non-disclosure of criminal antecedent; miscommunication; liberty to file fresh petition; disposal of petition; bail order dated 04.02.2026; Cr. Misc. No. 15222 of 2026; Cr. Misc. No. 6624 of 2026; PS Case No. 346/2025; Samastipur Muffassil; Patna High Court; Sourendra Pandey, J.; order dated 11-03-2026.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition stating the entire criminal antecedents of the petitioner; the present petition stands disposed of accordingly. ¶14

Ramjivan @ Ramjivan Kumar @ Ramjivan Kumar Paswan Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15222 of 2026

¶2

¶3

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6624 of 2026

¶4

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-346 Year-2025 Thana- SAMASTIPUR MUFFASIL DistrictSamastipur ====================================================== Ramjivan @ Ramjivan Kumar @ Ramjivan Kumar Paswan S/O Late Rajo Paswan Resident of Village- Sitalpatti, P.S- Muffassil, District- Samastipur (Bihar).

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar ===================	... ... Opposite Party/s ===================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : ===================	Mr. Akash Shankar, Advocate Mr. Raj Kumar, Advocate Ms. Nausheen Fatma, Advocate Ms. Archana Kushwaha, Advocate Mr. Shahnwaz Khan, Advocate Mr. Anees Ahmad, Advocate Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, APP ===================================
CORAM: HONOURABL	E MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY ORAL ORDER

¶8

2 11-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.

¶9

It has been submitted that the petitioner has been granted anticipatory bail vide order dated 04.02.2026 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 6624 of 2026, wherein the petitioner had disclosed that he carries three criminal antecedents, however in the order granting bail only one criminal antecedent of the petitioner was mentioned. It has further been submitted that the petitioner carries one more criminal antecedent but on account of miscommunication, the same was not informed to the counsel

¶10

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15222 of 2026(2) dt.11-03-2026 2/2

¶11

of the High Court.

¶12

In view of the above fact that there is fourth

¶13

criminal antecedent of the petitioner, the present application is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition stating the entire criminal antecedents of the petitioner.

¶14

The petition stands disposed of accordingly.

¶15

(Sourendra Pandey, J)

¶16

krishna/-

¶17

U T

Ramjivan @ Ramjivan Kumar @ Ramjivan Kumar Paswan v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramjivan @ Ramjivan Kumar @ Ramjivan Kumar Paswan v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Fuleshwar Rajak Vs The State of Bihar through Vigilance Department, Bihar, Patna.

Saurabh Sunil Vs The State of Bihar

Kamal Gupta Vs The State of Bihar

Raghuwar Thakur Vs The State of Bihar

Vinit Kumar @ Vinit Vatsa Vs The State of Bihar

Brajesh Kumar @ Brajesh Yadav Vs The State of Bihar