Pappu Kumar @ Pappu Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Man Mohan Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Madan Kumar ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 28-04-2026

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶13

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act.

¶14

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has already submitted the requisite fee and second defect shall be removed during the course of the day by adding the alias name of the father of the petitioner.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of five cases out of which three cases are under the Excise Act and allegation is of recovery of 110.125 liters of liquor from a place behind the bush near government canal.

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14818 of 2026(3) dt.28-04-2026 2/3

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not apprehended from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and even alleged recovery is from a place which does not belong to the petitioner and is accessible to public at large and he came to be implicated at the instance of local person, but then the name of the person who disclosed the name of the petitioner is not disclosed in the FIR which casts an aspersion on the case of the prosecution. It is also submitted that once an accused is implicated in a case relating to excise, the police starts implicating mechanically either at the instance of Chowkidar , local person, confessional statement or secret information without holding a proper investigation.

¶18

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

¶19

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Trial Court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on Provisional anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14818 of 2026(3) dt.28-04-2026 3/3

¶21

Court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Hisuwa P.S. Case No. 455 of 2025 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS.

¶22

It is made clear that thereafter the learned Trial Court shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the event if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of more than five cases then it would be presumed that petitioner, for the purposes of seeking anticipatory bail, had concealed his antecedent before this Court, as such, the provisional anticipatory bail order shall not be confirmed, but after verification if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of five cases only, in that event the provisional anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith.

¶23

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

¶24

Rishabh/-

¶25

U T

Pappu Kumar @ Pappu Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pappu Kumar @ Pappu Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hira Ram @ Hira Lal Ram Vs The State of Bihar

Raja singh @ Kumar Gautam Vs The State of Bihar

Mithlesh Giri @ Mithilesh Kumar Giri @ Mithlesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ankit Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Rekha Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Anjay Kumar @ Anjoy Kumar @ Ajay Kumar Vs The State of Bihar