Allowed¶19

Bikki Kumar Yadav @ Vikki Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC15 Apr 2026CR. MISC./14747/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

NDPS bail Patna High Court 2026; smack 205.94 gm recovered from bagpack; Kursela/Kursaila P.S. Case No. 282 of 2025, District Katihar; Sections 8(c) and 21(b) NDPS Act; Section 50 NDPS Act compliance argued; Section 105 BNSS non-compliance; seizure-list witnesses police personnel; hygroscopic contraband weight includes polythene; more than small but much less than commercial quantity; no criminal antecedent; judicial custody since 12.12.2025; bail bond Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties; Principal Sessions Judge Katihar; Justice Ashok Kumar Pandey.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Katihar, in connection with Kursela P.S. Case No.282 of 2025. ¶19

Bikki Kumar Yadav @ Vikki Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2026)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14747 of 2026

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-282 Year-2025 Thana- KURSAILA District- Katihar

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Bikki Kumar Yadav @ Vikki Kumar Yadav S/O Pramod Kumar Yadav Resident of Village- Madrauni, P.S.- Rangra, District- Bhagalpur

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bimal Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Veena Kumari Jaiswal, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 15-04-2026

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶13

The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Kursela P.S. Case No.282 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 8(c) and 21(b) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (in short ‘NDPS’) Act.

¶14

The case of the prosecution, in short is that from the bagpack of the petitioner, altogether 205.94 gm of smack like contraband was recovered.

¶15

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that the weight of the contraband

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14747 of 2026(3) dt.15-04-2026 2/3

¶17

which is alleged to be recovered from the possession of this petitioner is with polythene. It has further been submitted that the I.O. has recorded that the smack like contraband is hygroscopic material and its quantum may increase or decrease. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that the witnesses of the seizure list are police personnel and police have not complied Section 105 of the BNSS. It has further been submitted that police have not followed Section 50 of the NDPS Act. It has further been submitted that though the alleged recovery of contraband is more than small quantity but is much less than commercial quantity. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and he is in judicial custody since 12.12.2025.

¶18

The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

¶19

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the court of

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14747 of 2026(3) dt.15-04-2026 3/3

¶21

learned Principal Sessions Judge, Katihar in connection with Kursela P.S. Case No.282 of 2025.

¶22

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)

¶23

durgesh/-

¶24

U T

Bikki Kumar Yadav @ Vikki Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bikki Kumar Yadav @ Vikki Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Laxman Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ankit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Gaffar @ Shekh Gaffar Vs The State of Bihar

Sujan Maharjan Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Akram Vs The State of Bihar

Sajan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar