Manjeet Prasad @ Manjeet Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14607 of 2026

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-534 Year-2025 Thana- KESARIA District- East Champaran

======================================================

Manjeet Prasad @ Manjeet Kumar S/o- Harishchandra Prasad @ Hari Prasad Resident Of Village- Mathiya, Ps- Kesariya, Dist-East Champaran

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pravin Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajendra Prasad Nat ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 16-04-2026

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶12

A.P.P. for the State.

¶13

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of one case under the Excise Act and allegation is of recovery of 100.440 litres of liquor from a bush. It is next submitted that petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and even alleged recovery is from a place which does not belong to the petitioner and is accessible to public at large and he came to be implicated at the instance of chowkidar with whom he is on an inimical term. It is also submitted that if

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14607 of 2026(2) dt.16-04-2026 2/3

¶16

chowkidar was aware of the involvement of the petitioner in the occurrence then why he did not inform the police prior to institution of the instant FIR which casts an aspersion on the case of the prosecution.

¶17

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

¶18

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on provisional anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.5000/- (Rupees five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Kesariya P.S. Case No.534/2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

¶19

It is made clear that the learned trial court thereafter shall verify the criminal antecedents of the petitioner and in the event if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of more than one case, in that event, it would be presumed that petitioner had concealed his antecedent before this court, as such, the provisional anticipatory bail order shall not be confirmed but if on verification it is found that petitioner has antecedent of one

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14607 of 2026(2) dt.16-04-2026 3/3

¶21

case, in that event the provisional anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith.

¶22

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

¶23

amit/-

¶24

U T

Manjeet Prasad @ Manjeet Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manjeet Prasad @ Manjeet Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sameer Kumar Priyadarshi @ Samir Kumar Priyadarshi Vs The State of Bihar

Chotu @ Chotu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Pramod Mukhiya Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Asraful Vs The State of Bihar

Om Prakash Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Shivandra Kumar Ray @ Shivam Mishra Vs The State of Bihar