Avishek Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14359 of 2026

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-251 Year-2025 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Madhepura

======================================================

Avishek Kumar Son of Tribhuan Yadav @ Tribhuwan Yadav Resident of Village - Budhnagar, Ward No.- 03, Police Station - Ghailadh, District - Madhepura.

¶5

... ... Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Surya Narayan Yadav For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Nirmal Kumar Sinha ======================================================

¶8

... ... Opposite Party

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶10

4 06-05-2026

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶12

A.P.P. for the State.

¶13

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Madhepura Excise P.S. Case No. 251 of 2025, registered for the offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶14

As per the allegation, the informant got a secret information that the petitioner is dealing in sale and purchase of Codeine containing cough syrup. Accordingly, a raid was conducted and, as per the allegation, from a hut made of bamboo, total 222 liters of Codeine containing cough syrup was recovered. The said recovery was made in a concealed state from the heap containing burning wood.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14359 of 2026(4) dt.06-05-2026 2/3

¶17

that the hut in question from where the said recovery was allegedly made does not belong to the petitioner. It is further submitted that the search and seizure is in violation of Section 103 BNSS. It has further been submitted that the case does not fall under the Excise Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner has referred to paragraph 3 of the supplementary affidavit in which it has been submitted that the quantity of Codeine recovered from the entire seizure is 444 grams and hence it is much less than commercial quantity, which is one kg. He has further submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 11.10.2025 and has got no criminal antecedent.

¶18

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

¶19

Heard the parties and perused the record.

¶20

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the, above named, petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge VII-cum-Special Judge Excise-II, Madhepura, in connection with Madhepura P.S. Case No. 251 of 2025.

¶21

It is directed that the petitioner would appear on

¶22

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14359 of 2026(4) dt.06-05-2026 3/3

¶23

each and every date in the trial and on default on two successive dates without reasonable explanation, the bail of the petitioner would be cancelled.

¶24

It is further directed that if the petitioner gets himself involved in similar nature of offence, the prosecution will be at liberty to file appropriate petition for cancellation of his bail.

¶25

(Praveen Kumar, J)

¶26

Pawan/-

¶27

U T

Avishek Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Avishek Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Aman Kumar Singh @ Aman Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ranjeet Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Bharat Kumar Bhagat Vs The State of Bihar

Babul Virat Singh Vs The state of Bihar

Sushil Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Muntun @ Mintu Kumar @ Muntun Kumar Vs The State of Bihar