Rupan Murmu@ Rupan Mumur Vs The State of Bihar

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and allegation is of recovery of 6 litres of liquor along with Rs. 4,000/- from a motorcycle.

¶16

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and he came to be implicated based on the fact that he is owner of the seized vehicle. It is next submitted that no prudent person would use

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.135 of 2026(2) dt.13-01-2026 2/3

¶18

his own vehicle for committing an occurrence and thus would create evidence against himself and hence would get implicated, it is further submitted that petitioner was completely unaware that his wife, Jhumri Hembram, would misuse the vehicle in the manner as alleged, who was also apprehended from the spot.

¶19

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

¶20

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on Provisional anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 500/- (Rupees Five Hundred) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Kawakol P.S. Case No. 394 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

¶21

7. It is made clear that thereafter the learned Trial Court shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the event if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of even one case then it would be presumed that petitioner, for the purposes of seeking anticipatory bail, had concealed his antecedent before this Court, as such, the provisional anticipatory bail order shall not be

¶22

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.135 of 2026(2) dt.13-01-2026 3/3

¶23

confirmed, but after verification if it is found that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent in that event the provisional anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith.

¶24

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

¶25

Sumit/-

¶26

U T

Rupan Murmu@ Rupan Mumur v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rupan Murmu@ Rupan Mumur v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manjesh Kumar @ Manjesh Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Nausad Khan Vs The State of Bihar

Prashant Kumar @ Prashant Kumar Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Soni Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Sharwan Choudhary @ Sarwan Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Baldev Yadav @ Baaldev Yadav Vs The State of Bihar