Ramnath Ram Vs The State of Bihar

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shashank Shekhar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Asha Kumari, APPT ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 10-03-2026

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶13

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 274 and 275 of the BNS, 2023 read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and allegation is of recovery of 55 liters of liquor from a sack.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not apprehended from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and even alleged recovery is from a place which does not belong to the petitioner

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13251 of 2026(2) dt.10-03-2026 2/3

¶17

and is accessible to public at large and he came to be implicated at the instance of Chowkidar with whom he is on an inimical term. It is next submitted that if Chowkidar was aware of the involvement of the petitioner in the occurrence then why he did not inform the police prior to institution of the instant FIR which casts an aspersion on the case of the prosecution. It is next submitted that it appears that the Chowkidar in order to save the real culprits falsely implicated the petitioner, when petitioner admittedly is a person with clean antecedent.

¶18

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

¶19

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Trial Court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on Provisional anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 500/- (Rupees Five Hundred) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Ramgarhwa P.S. Case No. 507 of 2025 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS.

¶20

It is made clear that thereafter the learned Trial

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13251 of 2026(2) dt.10-03-2026 3/3

¶22

Court shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the event if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of even one case then it would be presumed that petitioner, for the purposes of seeking anticipatory bail, had concealed his antecedent before this Court, as such, the provisional anticipatory bail order shall not be confirmed, but after verification if it is found that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent in that event the provisional anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith.

¶23

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

¶24

Rishabh/-

¶25

U T

Ramnath Ram v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramnath Ram v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manoj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Satyanarayan Mukhiya @ Footballiya Vs The State of Bihar

Pappu Kumar Mandal Vs The State of Bihar

Ramchandra Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Akhilesh Sahani @ Akhilesh Kumar Sahani Vs The State of Bihar

Mithun Kumar Vs The State of Bihar