Allowed¶18

Ram Das @ Ram Das Sah @ Ramdash Sah v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC9 Mar 2026CR. MISC./12581/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court, Criminal Miscellaneous No.12581 of 2026, decided 09-03-2026, Ashok Kumar Pandey J — regular bail order; Dhaka P.S. Case No. 577 of 2025, District East Champaran; offences under Sections 336(3), 338, 340(2), 317(5) B.N.S. 2023; recovery of five alleged stolen bikes from petitioner's house; seizure attested by police personnel; alleged non-compliance with Section 105 BNSS; judicial custody since 14.10.2025; one criminal antecedent stated by APP; bail bond Rs. 10,000 with two sureties; S.D.J.M., Dhaka, East Champaran, Motihari.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Dhaka, East Champaran, Motihari, in connection with Dhaka P.S. Case No. 577 of 2025. ¶18

Ram Das @ Ram Das Sah @ Ramdash Sah Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12581 of 2026

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-577 Year-2025 Thana- DHAKA District- East Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ram Das @ Ram Das Sah @ Ramdash Sah S/o Bahalu Das Residetn of Village- Yadopur Nankar, P.S.- Dhaka, District- East Champaran, Motihari

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sharda Nand Mishra, Advocate Mr. Dhandev Kumar, Advocate Ms. Isha Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Raj Ballabh Singh, APP ======================================================

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 09-03-2026

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶12

The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Dhaka P.S. Case No. 577 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 336(3), 338, 340(2), 317(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.

¶13

The case of the prosecution, in short, is that five bikes were recovered from the house of this petitioner. The prosecution alleges that these bikes are stolen.

¶14

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that from perusal of the seizure list, it will

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12581 of 2026(2) dt.09-03-2026 2/2

¶16

transpire that the witnesses of the seizure list are police personnel and the police have not complied with Section 105 of the BNSS while making the seizure. He further submits that in any view of the matter, the only allegation against the petitioner is that of receiving the stolen property, which is triable by the magistrate. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 14.10.2025.

¶17

The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and submits that the petitioner has got one criminal antecedent.

¶18

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Dhaka, East Champaran, Motihari in connection with Dhaka P.S. Case No. 577 of 2025.

¶19

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)

¶20

Sudhanshu/-

¶21

U T

Ram Das @ Ram Das Sah @ Ramdash Sah v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Das @ Ram Das Sah @ Ramdash Sah v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pawan Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

Nagendra Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Dilkhush Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Rajeev Kumar @ Rajeev Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Ashutosh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Lablu singh @ Lablu Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar