Disposed¶15

Md. Naseem Akhtar @ Nashim Akhtar @ Nasim Akhtar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC18 Mar 2026CR. MISC./12295/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna HC Cr. Misc. No. 12295 of 2025 (decided 18-03-2026, Praveen Kumar, J); arises out of PS Case No. 494/2022, Thana Bhagwan Bazar, Saran; disposed of because trial stage changed (charges framed, 4 of 7 charge sheet witnesses examined); petitioners directed to raise all grounds at appropriate stage; no opinion expressed on merits.

What did the court decide?

Application disposed of with a direction to the petitioners to raise all the points available to them, including the grounds as mentioned in the application, at the appropriate stage; the Court expressly expressed no opinion on the merits. ¶15

Md. Naseem Akhtar @ Nashim Akhtar @ Nasim Akhtar Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12295 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-494 Year-2022 Thana- BHAGWAN BAZAR District- Saran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Md. Naseem Akhtar @ Nashim Akhtar @ Nasim Akhtar Son of Late Yakub Miyan @ Mohammad Yakoob Resident of Mohalla Daulatganj, Chiktoli, P.S. Bhagwan Bazar, District - Saran

¶5

Saleha Khatoon @ Saleha Khatun W/o Md. Naseem Akhtar @ Nashim Akhtar Resident of Mohalla Daulatganj, Chiktoli, P.S. Bhagwan Bazar, District - Saran

¶6

... ... Petitioner/s

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Bihar

¶9

Shivanand Pandey S/o Gajenda Nath Pandey Resident of village - Court Devi Garahitir, P.S.- Bhagwan Bazar, District -Saran

¶10

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶11

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nafisu Zzoha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Raj Kishor Singh, APP For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. Neeraj Prasad Sinha, Advocate ======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 18-03-2026 Heard the parties.

¶14

Learned counsel for the Opposite Party No.2 has submitted that by efflux of time, the charges came to be framed against the petitioners and out of seven charge sheet witnesses, four witnesses have been examined during the course of trial and submits that the stage as of now in the court below with regard to the present case, has changed.

¶15

In view of such specific statement of the Opposite Party No.2, this application is disposed of with a direction to the petitioners to raise all the points available to him including the

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12295 of 2025(2) dt.18-03-2026 2/2

¶17

grounds as mentioned in this application at appropriate stage.

¶18