Allowed¶22

Sudhanshu Kumar @ Bikki @ Rakesh v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC6 Apr 2026CR. MISC./12082/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Keywords: regular bail; section 392 IPC; robbery/snatching of bike; N.H. Bangra P.S. Case No. 07 of 2023; Musrigharari P.S. Case No. 53 of 2023 confessional statement; criminal antecedents seventeen cases; custody since 06.02.2024; bail bond Rs.10,000 two sureties; Judicial Magistrate Samastipur; conditions - trial presence, close-relative bailor, weekly attendance Kalyanpur P.S.; Patna High Court; Cr. Misc. No.12082 of 2026; decided 06-04-2026; Justice Ashok Kumar Pandey; bail allowed.

What did the court decide?

Regular bail granted; petitioner to be released on bail in connection with N.H. Bangra P.S. Case No. 07 of 2023 upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur, subject to the imposed conditions. ¶22

Sudhanshu Kumar @ Bikki @ Rakesh Vs The State Of Bihar — Patna HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶22

Issue for consideration

Whether the petitioner, Sudhanshu Kumar @ Bikki @ Rakesh, is entitled to be enlarged on regular bail in connection with N.H. Bangra P.S. Case No. 07 of 2023, registered for the offence punishable under section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶16

Court's answer

Considering the facts and circumstances, the court was inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and directed his release on bail in connection with N.H. Bangra P.S. Case No. 07 of 2023 on furnishing a bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur.

¶22

Ratio / Principle

Release on bail was made subject to conditions, including that the petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and remain physically present in the trial court on each and every fixed date.

¶23

Key takeaways

Further bail condition imposed: the petitioner is directed to mark his weekly attendance at Kalyanpur P.S.; additionally, one of the bailors should be a close relative of the petitioner.ratio¶25

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Patna High Court (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J.) allowed a regular-bail application by Sudhanshu Kumar @ Bikki @ Rakesh in connection with N.H. Bangra P.S. Case No. 07 of 2023 (PS. Case No.-7 Year-2023, Thana-NATIONAL HIGHWAY, District Samastipur), registered for an offence under section 392 of the Indian Penal Code, wherein unknown miscreants allegedly snatched the informant's bike. Counsel pleaded the petitioner was framed due to criminal antecedents, had only a confessional statement given on remand from Musrigharari P.S. Case No. 53 of 2023, with nothing recovered from him, and had been in judicial custody since 06.02.2024; the APP opposed, citing seventeen criminal antecedent cases. Bail was granted on a bond of Rs.10,000/- with two like sureties before the Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur, conditioned on trial attendance on every fixed date, a close-relative bailor, and weekly attendance at Kalyanpur P.S.

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12082 of 2026

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-7 Year-2023 Thana- NATIONAL HIGHWAY DistrictSamastipur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Sudhanshu Kumar @ Bikki @ Rakesh S/O Mahesh Prasad Resident of vill.Basudeopur, P.S.- Kalyanpur, District- Samastipur

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rani Shashi Bharti, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rana Randhir Singh, APP

¶11

======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER

¶13

3 06-04-2026

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶15

APP for the State.

¶16

The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶17

The case of the prosecution is that some unknown miscreants have snatched the bike of the informant.

¶18

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he has been framed in this case due to his criminal antecedent and he has been remanded in this case from Musrigharari P.S. Case No. 53 of 2023 wherein he has given his confessional statement. Save and except confessional statement, there is nothing against him. Nothing has been recovered from his possession. Moreover, he is languishing

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12082 of 2026(3) dt.06-04-2026 2/2

¶20

in judicial custody since 06.02.2024.

¶21

Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail and has submitted that petitioner is having criminal antecedent of seventeen cases.

¶22

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with N.H. Bangra P.S. Case No. 07 of 2023 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur with following conditions:-

¶23

(i) The petitioner shall cooperate in trial and shall remain physically present in the trial court on each and every fixed date.

¶24

(ii) One of the bailors should be close relative of the petitioner.

¶25

(iii) Petitioner is also directed to mark his weekly attendance at Kalyanpur P.S.

¶26

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)

¶27

shubham/- U T

Sudhanshu Kumar @ Bikki @ Rakesh v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sudhanshu Kumar @ Bikki @ Rakesh v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kunal Ray @ Kunal Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Nagendra paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Rakesh Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Absar Alam @ Absar Alam @ Md. Absar Vs The State of Bihar

Sujit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Vickky Kumar @ Bittu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar