Disposed

Vijay Mahto v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC24 Feb 2026CR. MISC./11789/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner apprehends arrest in an excise case over alleged recovery of liquor and fermented mahua solution from a brewery. Counsel argued he was not present at the spot and the informant's name is undisclosed. Court granted provisional anticipatory bail subject to antecedent verification.

What did the court decide?

Provisional anticipatory bail on Rs.5,000 bond with two sureties, subject to surrender within six weeks and confirmation after antecedent verification by Trial Court.

Vijay Mahto Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2026)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11789 of 2026

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-70 Year-2025 Thana- EXCISE MANJHAUL District- Begusarai

¶3

======================================================

¶4

VIJAY MAHTO S/o Ram Bilash Mahto Resident of Village- Darha, P.S.Bakhri, District- Begusarai

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Tarkeshwar Nath Thakur, APP ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 24-02-2026

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶14

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Excise Act.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of one case and allegation is of recovery of 122 liters of liquor from brewery of petitioner along with 252 liters of fermented Jawa Mahua solution which destroyed at the spot.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not apprehended from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and is not the owner of the brewery and even alleged recovery is from a place

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11789 of 2026(2) dt.24-02-2026 2/3

¶18

which does not belong to the petitioner and he came to be implicated at the instance of local person, but then the name of the person who disclosed the name of the petitioner is not disclosed in the FIR which casts an aspersion on the case of the prosecution.

¶19

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

¶20

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Trial Court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on Provisional anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Excise Manjhaul P.S. Case No. 70 of 2025 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS.

¶21

It is made clear that thereafter the learned Trial Court shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the event if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of more than one case then it would be presumed that petitioner, for the purposes of seeking anticipatory bail, had concealed his

¶22

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11789 of 2026(2) dt.24-02-2026 3/3

¶23

antecedent before this Court, as such, the provisional anticipatory bail order shall not be confirmed, but after verification if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of one case only, in that event the provisional anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith.

¶24

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

¶25

Rishabh/-

¶26

U T

Vijay Mahto v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vijay Mahto v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Archana Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Rameshwar Dhangad @ Rameshwar Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Indradev Kumar Singh @ Indradev Kumar @ Indal Kumar @ Indal Vs The State of Bihar

Bittu Manjhi Vs The State of Bihar

Guddu Kamat @ Jay Kamat Vs The State of Bihar

Jyoti Devi Vs The State Of Bihar