Allowed¶6

Shailendra Yadav @ Karu v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC25 Feb 2026CR. MISC./11183/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail; Arms Act; section 25(1-B)a; section 26; country made pistol; live cartridge; recovery from house; custody since 7.9.2025; chargesheet filed; Gaurichak P.S. Case No. 623 of 2025; Patna; bail bond Rs.10,000/-; two sureties; Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-II, Patna City; Partha Sarthy, J; CR. MISC. No.11183 of 2026.

What did the court decide?

Regular bail granted; petitioner to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-II, Patna City, District Patna. ¶6

Shailendra Yadav @ Karu Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11183 of 2026

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-623 Year-2025 Thana- GAURICHAK District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Shailendra Yadav @ Karu S/o Yadu Yadav R/o Village- Bibipur, P.SGaurichak, Dist- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bipin Kumar Deo, Advocate Mr. Birender Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Dr. Ajeet Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY

¶9

ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 25-02-2026

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶12

The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Gaurichak P.S. Case no. 623 of 2025 registered under section 25(1-B)a and 26 of the Arms Act.

¶13

As per the prosecution case, a country made pistol and a live cartridge was recovered from the house of the petitioner.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no incriminating article has been recovered from his house or his possession. He has been falsely implicated in the case because of his antecedents. He is in custody since 7.9.2025 and chargesheet has been submitted in the case.

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11183 of 2026(2) dt.25-02-2026 2/2

¶16

The application for bail is opposed by learned APP

¶17

for the State.

¶18

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegations in the FIR, the petitioner having remained in custody for five months since 7.9.2025 and chargesheet having been submitted in the case, the Court directs the petitioner to be enlarged on bail in connection with Gaurichak P.S. Case no. 623 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-II, Patna City, District Patna.

¶19

(Partha Sarthy, J)

¶20

sauravkrsinha/-

¶21

U T

Shailendra Yadav @ Karu v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shailendra Yadav @ Karu v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vinay Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Bobby Deol Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Naushad Shekh Vs The State of Bihar

Tuntun Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Hiramani Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Shankar Rai @ Shankar Singh @ Sankar Ray @ Sankar Singh Vs The State of Bihar