Allowed¶21

Sonu Kumar Gupta @ Sonu Gupta v. The State of Bihar

Bail – Second regular bail application

Patna HC11 Mar 2026CR. MISC./10392/2026

Download

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court, CRL. MISC. No. 10392 of 2026, decided 11-03-2026 by Justice Rudra Prakash Mishra. Regular bail granted in second attempt in Sherghati P.S. Case No. 393 of 2024 (Gaya), offences under Sections 309(6) and 109 BNS 2023 and Section 27 Arms Act. Grounds: custody since 04.08.2024, trial delay (only two witnesses after charge), parity with co-accused bail dated 25.02.2026, Article 21 speedy trial / punitive pretrial incarceration. Bail bond Rs. 15,000 with two sureties. State opposed through A.P.P.

What did the court decide?

Regular bail granted to the petitioner on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Court below/concerned Court. ¶21

Sonu Kumar Gupta @ Sonu Gupta Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 10392 of 2026

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-393 Year-2024 Thana- SHERGHATI District- Gaya

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Sonu Kumar Gupta @ Sonu Gupta S/o Munna Saw R/o VillageKhanjahanpur, P.O- Khanjahanpur, P.S- Buniyadganj, Manpur, Dist- Gaya Ji, Bihar

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sanjay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Sanjay Kumar Singh, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA

¶10

ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 11-03-2026

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶13

APP for the State.

¶14

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sherghati P.S. Case No. 393 of 2024, instituted for the offence under Sections 309(6) and 109 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

¶15

Earlier vide order dated 16.04.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 4466 of 2025, regular bail of the petitioner was rejected by this Court considering the nature and gravity of the offence, with a direction to the court below to expedite the trial and conclude the same expeditiously.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present one is the second attempt for grant of regular bail to the petitioner. It is mainly submitted that charge in this case is

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 10392 of 2026(3) dt.11-03-2026 2/3

¶18

framed and till date, only two witnesses have been examined in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that other co-accused has been granted bail by this Bench vide order dated 25.02.2026 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 12841 of 2026. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 04.08.2024. Learned counsel further submits that there is no likelihood of the trial being concluded in the near future. Learned counsel goes on to submit that the continued incarceration of the petitioner without conclusion of trial amounts to a gross violation of the fundamental right guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, which is reiterated by Hon’ble Apex Court in plethora of judgments.

¶19

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

¶20

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody of the petitioner and taking into account the fact that continued detention of the petitioner would serve no purpose other than punitive pretrial incarceration, which is antithetical to the spirit of Article 21 of the Constitution of India, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

¶21

Let the petitioner be released on bail on

¶22

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 10392 of 2026(3) dt.11-03-2026 3/3

¶23

furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Sherghati P.S. Case No. 393 of 2024.

¶24

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)

¶25

manish/-

¶26

U T

Sonu Kumar Gupta @ Sonu Gupta v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sonu Kumar Gupta @ Sonu Gupta v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Afroj Mansuri Vs The State of Bihar

Shivam Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Raushan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Shahabuddin @ Md. sharad @ Sharad Vs The State of Bihar

Golden Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Raja Yadav Vs The State of Bihar