Disposed¶27

Rajendra Singh and Ors. v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC16 Mar 2026CR. MISC./10343/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court, CR. MISC. No.10343 of 2018, decided 16-03-2026 by Sunil Dutta Mishra, J. Quashing petition concerning Mahila P.S. Case No. 42 of 2014 (District Rohtas), offences under Sections 498A, 323, 341, 504, 342, 34 IPC and Section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act, pending before S.D.J.M., Dehri on Sone. Disposed of as infructuous on joint submission of counsel; A.P.P. had no objection; no merits of the quashing prayer adjudicated. No precedents cited.

What did the court decide?

Case disposed of as it has become infructuous, on the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner and with no objection from learned A.P.P. for the State. ¶27

Rajendra Singh and Ors. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr. — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2026)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10343 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-42 Year-2014 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Rohtas

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Rajendra Singh S/o Late Sant Bilas Singh,

¶5

Asha Devi W/o Rajendra Singh,

¶6

Sanjay Kumar Singh @ Munna Singh S/o Rajendra Singh,

¶7

Bibha Devi W/o Munna Singh, All R/o Village- Basdiha, P.S.- Karakat Godari P.S.- Rohtas, Distt.- Rohtas.

¶8

Bindu Devi W/o Santosh Singh, R/o Village- Pithni, P.S.- Dinare, Distt.Rohtas.

¶9

... ... Petitioner/s

¶10

Versus

¶11

The State of Bihar

¶12

Rajendra Singh S/o Late Atal Bihari Singh, R/o Village- Paduhar, P.S.Dariaht, Distt.- Rohtas.

¶13

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶14

======================================================

¶15

Appearance :

¶16

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sabal Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ajit Kumar, APP

¶17

======================================================

¶18

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER

¶19

4 16-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶20

This petition has been filed for quashing the entire

¶21

criminal proceeding launched against the petitioners in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No. 42 of 2014 for an alleged offence registered u/s 498A, 323, 341, 504, 342, 34 of the I.P.C. and Section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act pending in the Court of learned S.D.J.M., Dehri on Sone (Rohtas).

¶22