Allowed¶21

Prince Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC29 Jan 2026CR. APP (SJ)/3817/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Prince Kumar v. The State of Bihar & Anr., Patna High Court, CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.3817 of 2025, decided 29-01-2026 by Justice Rudra Prakash Mishra. Bail appeal against rejection by 1st Additional Sessions Judge cum Special Judge, Siwan (order dated 06.08.2025) in Siwan Muffasil P.S. Case No. 348 of 2024 under Sections 302/34 IPC, Section 27 Arms Act, Sections 3(1)(r)(s), 3(2)(v) SC/ST Act. Allowed: no allegation of firing against appellant in case diary plus custody since 19.07.2025; bail granted on Rs.15,000/- bond with two like sureties.

What did the court decide?

Appeal allowed; order dated 06.08.2025 of the 1st Additional Sessions Judge cum Special Judge, Siwan in Siwan Muffasil P.S. Case No. 348 of 2024 set aside; appellant to be released on bail on bail bonds of Rs.15,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each. ¶21

Prince Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2026)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.3817 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-348 Year-2024 Thana- SIWAN MUFFASIL District- Siwan

¶3

====================================================== Prince Kumar S/o Omprakash Thakur R/o Village - Pakwalia, P.S - Hussainganj, District - Siwan

¶4

... ... Appellant/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar

¶7

Ajay Kumar S/o Late Nawal Kumar Ram R/o Mohalla - Mahadeva Mission, P.S - Siwan Muffasil (Mahadeva O.P), District - Siwan

¶8

... ... Respondent/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr.Rakesh Kumar Shrivastava, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Binay Krishna, SPP Mr. Sheojee Mishra, Advocate ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

4 29-01-2026

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the appellant, learned Special Public Prosecutor for the State and learned counsel for the informant. Perused the case diary.

¶14

The instant appeal has been filed by the appellant against the order dated 06.08.2025 passed by learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge cum Special Judge, Siwan whereby the prayer for bail of the appellant in connection with Siwan Muffasil P.S. Case No. 348 of 2024 under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 27 of the Arms Act and Sections 3(1)(r)(s), 3(2)(v) of SC/ST Act was rejected.

¶15

Accusation against the three unknown accused persons is of firing upon the informant’s brother due to which he

¶16

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.3817 of 2025(4) dt.29-01-2026 2/3

¶17

died.

¶18

Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the appellant is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case only on the basis of suspicion. Petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The name of the petitioner transpired in this case on the basis of at the instance of the co-accused. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that, as per the material available in the case diary, there is no specific allegation against the petitioner. Learned counsel further submitted that there is no eye-witness to the alleged occurrence. He next submits that as per the impugned order, the specific allegation of firing is attributed to co-accused Jimmi @ Master Jitendra Yadav. Learned counsel for the appellant further submits that the appellant has not taken the caste name of the informant in public view, hence, no offence under the provisions of SC/ST Act is made out against him. The appellant has no intention to disgrace the image of the informant in public view. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. Learned counsel for the appellant further submits that other co-accused has been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 21.03.2025 passed in Cr. Appeal (SJ) No. 5187 of 2024. The appellant is in custody since 19.07.2025 and has no criminal antecedent.

¶19

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.3817 of 2025(4) dt.29-01-2026 3/3

¶20

Learned Special P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant have vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the appellant.

¶21

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, there being no allegation of firing against the petitioner as per the material available in the case diary and the period of custody undergone by the appellant, this Court is inclined to allow this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed and order dated 06.08.2025 passed by learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge cum Special Judge, Siwan in connection with Siwan Muffasil P.S. Case No. 348 of 2024 is hereby set aside.

¶22

Let the appellant, abovenamed, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.15,000/- (Fifteen thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Siwan Muffasil P.S. Case No. 348 of 2024.

¶23

The appeal stands allowed.

¶24

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)

¶25

manish/-

Prince Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prince Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Krishna Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sunil Ray @ Sunil Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Chitranjan Rai @ Chitranjan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Vivek Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Rinku Vs The State of Bihar

Sunny Kumar Vs The State of Bihar