Vishal Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.3642 of 2025 In

¶2

CRIMINAL REVISION No.616 of 2022

¶3

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-202 Year-2021 Thana- ADAPUR District- East Champaran

¶4

======================================================

¶5

Vishal Kumar Son of Anil Prasad Resident Of Village- Jamunbhar, PsAdapur, Dist- East Champaran

¶6

... ... Appellant/s

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Bihar bihar

¶9

Harun Miyan Son of Late Sarfuddin Miyan Resident Of Village- Jamunbhar, Ps- Adapur, Dist- East Champaran

¶10

... ... Respondent/s

¶11

====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar No.III For the Respondent/s : Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Singh ======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶13

6 12-01-2026

¶14

Learned counsel for the appellant was directed to

¶15

remove the defects during the course of the day and after removal of the same, this case has been heard.

¶16

Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned APP for the State.

¶17

The present application has been filed on behalf of the appellant against the order dated 1.8.2022 passed by the learned 1^st Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Spl. Judge, Children’s Court, Motihari, East Champaran in connection with Children Trial No. 9 of 2022.

¶18

As per the prosecution case, the appellant is accused in a case of abducting the victim girl and committing

¶19

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.3642 of 2025(6) dt.12-01-2026 2/3

¶20

rape with her.

¶21

Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that the appellant has been held to be juvenile and on the date of occurrence he has been assessed to be less than eighteen years.

¶22

Learned counsel for the appellant further relies upon the provisions of the Section 3(i), (iv), (v) and (xiv) of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015. He also relies upon Section 12 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 and has submitted that bail is a rule and denial of bail to a juvenile is an exception.

¶23

He further submits that though the appellant is a child in conflict with law but he has remained in jail since 22.7.2021 and the Court below has not considered the law with regard to the release of juvenile under the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015.

¶24

Learned counsel for the appellant further submits that family members of the appellant including the father of the appellant will take care of the appellant so that he may not do any further crime and he may not remain in the company of the criminals.

¶25

Considering the aforesaid facts, this application is allowed and the order dated 1.8.2022, is hereby set aside.

¶26

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.3642 of 2025(6) dt.12-01-2026 3/3

¶27

Let the appellant, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned 1^st Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Spl. Judge, Children’s Court, Motihari, East Champaran in connection with Children Trial No. 9 of 2022, subject to the following conditions:-

¶28

(i) that one of the bailors should be the father of the appellant.

¶29

(ii) that the father of the appellant shall file an affidavit before the concerned Court below, giving specific undertaking that after release of the appellant on bail, he will take proper care of the appellant and will not allow him to fall into bad company.

¶30

(iii) The appellant will co-operate in the trial in the Children Court. He will appear personally or through his lawyer. Any default in the same will result in the cancellation of the bail bonds of the appellant.

¶31

(Sandeep Kumar, J)

¶32

Vikas/-

¶33

U

Vishal Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vishal Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ram Naresh Jha @ Bikau Jha Vs The State of Bihar

Abhisek @ Shashi Pandit @ Sashi Pandit Vs The State of Bihar

Manish Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Umar Farooque Vs The State of Bihar

Bibi Sakina @ Sakina and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Raushan Kumar @ Raushan Kumar Mandal Vs The State of Bihar