Dismissed¶18

Manjay Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC6 Apr 2026/10134/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail dismissed; Manjay Kumar; Derni P.S. Case No. 194 of 2025; Saran; B.N.S. 2023 Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 352, 351(2), 3, 3(5); repeated knife blow, grievous injury; custody since 08.09.2025; one criminal antecedent; renewal of bail prayer if prosecution delays trial; observations prima facie; Justice Sandeep Kumar; decided 06-04-2026; Crl. Misc. No. 10134 of 2026.

What did the court decide?

Bail refused for the present; liberty reserved to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail if the trial is delayed by the prosecution. ¶18

Manjay Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10134 of 2026

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-194 Year-2025 Thana- DERNI BAZAR District- Saran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Manjay Kumar S/o Harendra Pandit R/o Village - Nanfar, P.S - Derni, District - Saran at Chapra

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar Bihar

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vijay Kumar, Advocate Ms. Rajani Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dr. Mrityunjaya Kr. Gautam, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶9

3 06-04-2026

¶10

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and

¶11

learned APP for the State.

¶12

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Derni P.S. Case No. 194 of 2025 registered for the offence under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 352, 351(2), 3, 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.

¶13

The petitioner is accused of giving repeated knife blow on the victim causing grievous injury.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has not committed any offence. Petitioner is in custody since 08.09.2025 having one criminal antecedent.

¶15

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10134 of 2026(3) dt.06-04-2026 2/2

¶17

opposed the prayer for bail.

¶18

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and also there is direct allegation against the petitioner of giving knife blow to the victim causing grievous injury, this application is dismissed for the present.

¶19

If the trial is delayed by the prosecution, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail.

¶20

8 . It is made clear that any observation made herein is prima facie in nature and limited solely for the purpose of adjudication of the present bail application. Such observations shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case and shall not influence the trial or any other proceedings in any manner.

¶21

(Sandeep Kumar, J)

¶22

Ranjeet/-

¶23

U T

Manjay Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manjay Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Tahir Vs The State of Bihar

Suraj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sunil Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Akhilesh Bhagat Vs The State of Bihar

Banti Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sunil Kumar Singh @ Sunil Singh Vs The State of Bihar