Second appeal of 1992 dismissed for default as the appellant's counsel was absent on multiple dates and notices were duly served; dismissal under Order 41 Rule 17 CPC.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA SECOND APPEAL No.38 of 1992
======================================================
Dr. Ram Sagar Singh, Son of Late Jagarnath Singh, Resident of Village and P.O.-Madarpur, P.S. Mashrak, District- Saran.
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
Both residents of Village-Madarpur, P.S. Mashrak, District- Saran.
Respondent Nos. 4 to 6 are sons of Binayak Roy, deceased, resident of Village-Madarpur. P.S. Mashrak, P.O. Madarpur, District- Saran.
... ...Defendant/s / Appellant/s / Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s : None For the Respondent/s : None
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER
19 02-09-2025
On several dates i.e., on 23.06.2022, 04.08.2022,
13.10.2022, 13.04.2023, 21.02.2025, 18.08.2025 and 25.08.2025, nobody appears on behalf of the learned counsel for the appellant.
Patna High Court SA No.38 of 1992(19) dt.02-09-2025 2/2
from 2022 and even today on repeated calls, no one appears on behalf of the appellant as well as notices have validly been served against them as reported in the office notes dated 30.08.2025, so in this circumstances, this second appeal is dismissed for default under Order 41 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
(Ramesh Chand Malviya, J)
Anand Kr.
U
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dr. Ram Sagar Singh
Most. Parbati Kuer
Radhika Devi
Pashupatiya
Megh Nath Roy @ Mokhtar Rai
Bacha Roy
Ramesh Chand Malviya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
