Gyatri Kumari Vs The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL REVIEW No.41 of 2023

¶2

In

¶3

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10783 of 2021

¶4

======================================================

¶5

Gyatri Kumari Daughter of Ratneshwar Thakur Resident of VillageMansapur, P.S.- Mansapur, District- Madhubani.

¶6

Rajdhar Prasad Yadav, Son of Ramfal Yadav Resident of Village- Laxmipur, P.O.- Dhabhi, P.S.- Dhabhi, District- Madhubani.

¶7

Pradip Kumar Jha, Son of Mohanji Jha Resident of Village and PostMansapur, P.S.- Mansapur, District- Madhubani.

¶8

Sanjay Kumar Choudhary, Son of Dilip Choudhary Resident of Village and Post- Mansapur, P.S.- Mansapur, District- Madhubani.

¶9

Rubi Kumari, Daughter of Ram Narayan Raman Resident of VillageHirpatti, P.O.- Kakardobh, P.S.- Narahia, District- Madhubani.

¶10

Sisir Choudhary, Son of Sailendra Narayan Choudhary Resident of VillageDadpatti, P.O. and P.S.- Kurso Ladayami, District- Darbhanga.

¶11

Manoj Kumar Yadav, Son of Surya Narayan Yadav Resident of VillageKurivan, P.O.- Dhabani, P.S.- Dhabahi, District- Madhubani.

¶12

... ... Petitioner/s

¶13

Versus

¶14

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.

¶15

The Special Director, Secondary Education, (In-charge Sanskrit), New Secretariat, Patna.

¶16

The Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, through its Secretary off Polo Road, Patna.

¶17

The Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, through is Secretary, off Polo Road, Patna.

¶18

The Managing Committee, through its Secretary, Ajablal Sarbjanik Sanskrit Uchcha Vidyalaya, Mansapur, District- Madhubani.

¶19

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the State : Mr. Apurva Kumar, AC to GA-12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER

¶20

3 24-07-2025 No one appears on behalf of the petitioners though

¶21

State is present.

¶22

Patna High Court C. REV. No.41 of 2023(3) dt.24-07-2025 2/4

¶23

The present petition has been preferred for the grant of following relief(s):

¶24

“for review of the order dated 12.04.2022 passed in CWJC No. 10783 of 2021 by the Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma (as his lordship then was), has been disposed of the writ petition in terms of order dated 23.02.2022 passed in CWJC No. 5489 of 2020 (Suresh Ram vs. The State of Bihar and Ors.).”

¶25

The writ petition was filed for the grant of following relief(s):

¶26

“(i) For issuance of a writ in the nature of a writ of mandamus directing and commanding the Respondent No.3 and 4 to grant approval to the appointment of the Petitioners on the post of Assistant Teachers duly made by the Managing Committee of the school on the sanctioned post within sanctioned strength (Manak Mandal) and duly recommended by the Secretary/Headmaster of

¶27

Patna High Court C. REV. No.41 of 2023(3) dt.24-07-2025 3/4

¶28

the school as required under Rule 8(2) of the Bihar Non Government Sanskrit School Teachers Service Conditions Rules 2015.

¶29

(ii) For issuance of consequential writ/order/direction to the Respondents for payment of their salary as required under law.

¶30

(iii) For issuance of any other consequential writ/order/direction to the Respondents for which the Petitioners are found to be entitled to under the facts and circumstances of the case.”

¶31

It is the case of the petitioner that the prayer was entirely different and as such, the same was erroneously sent to the District Appellate Authority following the judgment dated 23.02.2022 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 5489 of 2020 (Suresh Ram Vrs. The State of Bihar & Ors.) and connected matters reported in 2022 (2) B.L.J., 381 and the judgment dated 07.03.2022 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 34 of 2022 (Minakshi @ Sushre Minakshi & Anr. Vrs. The State of Bihar & Ors.).

¶32