Disposed¶20

Pawan Kumar, v. The Union of India

Patna HC16 Apr 2025MJC/454/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

MJC No.454 of 2022, Patna High Court, decided 16-04-2025, NAFR, oral judgment per P. B. Bajanthri, J. with S. B. Pd. Singh, J.; arises in CWJC No.8307 of 2021; petitioner Pawan Kumar; respondents Union of India/East Central Railway officials (General Manager Hajipur, CPO Hajipur, DRM Dhanbad, Sr. DPO Dhanbad, Station Superintendent Gajhandi); compassionate appointment; co-ordinate Bench direction to reconsider afresh; reasoned and speaking order dated 11.03.2022 as Annexure-R-4 to show cause; grievance considered and rejected; MJC dropped; liberty reserved to petitioner to assail Annexure-R-4 order.

What did the court decide?

The MJC stands dropped, with liberty reserved to the petitioner to assail the order dated 11.03.2022 (Annexure-R-4) to show cause. ¶20

Pawan Kumar, Vs The Union of India — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.454 of 2022

¶2

¶3

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8307 of 2021

¶4

======================================================

¶5

Pawan Kumar, son of Late Dileshwar Yadav, Resident of Village-Manjhla Khurd, P.O.-Dumari Chatti, P.S.-Fatehpur, District-Gaya.

¶6

... ... Petitioner/s

¶7

Versus

¶8

The Union of India through Sri Chhatrahal Singh, the General Manager, East Central Railway, Hajipur.

¶9

Sri Anup Sharma, son of not known the petitioner, The Chief Personnel Officer, East Central Railway, Hajipur.

¶10

Sri Ashish Bansal, son of not known the petitioner, The Divisional Railway Manager, Dhanbad Division, P.O.-Dhanbad, District-Dhanbad.

¶11

Sri Manoj Kumar, son of not known the petitioner, The Senior Divisional Personnel Officer, Dhanbad Division, East Central Railway, P.O.-Dhanbad, District-Dhanbad.

¶12

Sri Vikash Chandra Yadav, The Station Superintendent, Gajhandi Railway Station, P.O. Gajhandi, District-Koderma.

¶13

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶14

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dinu Kumar, Advocate Ms.Ritika Rani, Advocate Ms. Himja G. Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dr. Maurya Vuijay Chandra, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. B. PD. SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI)

¶15

Date : 16-04-2025

¶16

In the light of reasoned and speaking order dated 11.03.2022 furnished as Annexure-R-4 to show cause, it is evident that the grievance of the appellant has been considered and rejected.

¶17