Dismissed¶18
Jagdish Jha v. Gita Devi and Ors.
Patna HCC.Misc./2124/2017
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Patna High Court, C.M. No.2124 of 2017, Jagdish Jha v. Gita Devi, Barath Jha, Luxman Jha, Vashistha Jha, Rambabu Jha and Meena Devi (residents of Vaishali/Muzaffarpur districts). Oral order dated 25-07-2025 by Justice Arun Kumar Jha dismissing the petition for non-prosecution owing to repeated non-appearance of the petitioner and apparent loss of interest. No appearance by counsel for petitioner ('None'); no merits decided; no statutes or case-law cited; no quantum involved.
What did the court decide?
The petitioner did not appear through counsel on the date of the order, and no one had appeared on his behalf on the last date of hearing either; the Court recorded that the petitioner appears to have lost interest in his case. ¶17