The court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution as the petitioner was absent and had previously sought time, indicating a loss of interest in the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.1870 of 2017
======================================================
Ashish Kumar Abhishek Son of Late Natho Yadav, Resident of VillageKhajuri, P.S- Sour Bazar, District- Saharsa.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
Reena Devi Wife of Ashish Kumar Abhishek, resident of East Railway Colony Ward No. 29, Qr. No. L/29, P.S. District- Saharsa, Presently D/o Ram Chandra Yadav, Village- Chakla, P.S. Mahaddi Nagar, District- Samastipur.
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER
4 22-07-2025 On call, none appears for the petitioner.
time was sought on behalf of the petitioner. It seems the petitioner has lost his interest in this case and accordingly, the present petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Arun Kumar Jha, J)
DKS/-
U
Ashish Kumar Abhishek
Reena Devi
Arun Kumar Jha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
