Ram Sakal Singh Yadav v. Smt. Veena Rai and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the civil miscellaneous petition. The court accorded permission and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the civil miscellaneous petition. The court accorded permission and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.1831 of 2017
======================================================
Ram Sakal Singh Yadav S/o Late Bhimsen Yadav, Resident of VillageBallami Chak, P.S. Phulwarisharif, District Patna.
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Deepak Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER
withdraw this petition.
withdrawn.
(Arun Kumar Jha, J)
anuradha/-
U
Ram Sakal Singh Yadav
Smt. Veena Rai
Smt. Kamlavati Devi
Smt. Mina Devi
The Sadgun Sahkari Grih Nirman Samiti Limited, Anisabad
Sh. Lal Babu Rai
Arun Kumar Jha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court