Dismissed¶14

Devendra Nath Puri v. Bihar State Religious Trust Board Bidyapati Marg Patna

Patna HC17 Apr 2025C.Misc./158/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court; Civil Miscellaneous (C.Misc.) No.158 of 2024; Justice Arun Kumar Jha; decided 17-04-2025; Order 1 Rule 10(2) Code of Civil Procedure; impleadment of intervenors; order dated 11.09.2023 by Additional District Judge-XXIII Patna; Misc. Case No. 115 of 2011 disposed 22.03.2025; petition dismissed as withdrawn; liberty to raise issue before appellate court; Bihar State Religious Trust Board; Sheo Mandir Ramji Chak; Devendra Nath Puri; Kameshwar Singh.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the petitioner to take up the issue before the appellate court (against the order dated 22.03.2025 in Misc. Case No. 115 of 2011) in accordance with law. ¶14

Devendra Nath Puri Vs Bihar State Religious Trust Board Bidyapati Marg Patna — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.158 of 2024

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Devendra Nath Puri, S/o Late Yojendra Nath Puri, Resident of Village- Ramji Chak, P.S.- Digha, P.O.- Bata Gung, District- Patna.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

Bihar State Religious Trust Board Bidyapati Marg Patna through its President Sri Akhlesh Jain at Bidyapati Marg, P.S.- Budha Colony, DistrictPatna.

¶7

Kameshwar Singh, S/o Late Bindeshwari Singh, Secretary of Sheo Mandir, Ramji Chak, P.S.- Digha, District- Patna.

¶8

... ... Respondent/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramhansh Kumar Puri, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ganpati Trivedi, Sr. Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶10

3 17-04-2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

¶11

petitioner has challenged the order dated 11.09.2023 passed by learned Additional District Judge-XXIII, Patna in Misc. Case No. 115 of 2011 whereby and whereunder the learned trial court allowed the application dated 07.02.2017 filed on behalf of intervenors under Order 1 Rule 10(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure and thus allowed the intervenors to be impleaded as party in the above noted miscellaneous case. Learned counsel further submits that Misc. Case No. 115 of 2011 has been disposed of on 22.03.2025 and, hence, the present matter has become infructuous and petitioner has already filed an appeal against the order passed on 22.03.2025 passed in Misc. Case

¶12

Patna High Court C.Misc. No.158 of 2024(3) dt.17-04-2025 2/2

¶13

No. 115 of 2011. Thus, the learned counsel seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to raise the issue before the appellate court which has been impugned before this Court.

¶14

Since the matter has become infructuous, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to take up the issue before the appellate court which was under challenge before this Court in accordance with law.

¶15

(Arun Kumar Jha, J)

¶16

balmukund/-

¶17

Devendra Nath Puri v. Bihar State Religious Trust Board Bidyapati Marg Patna

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Devendra Nath Puri v. Bihar State Religious Trust Board Bidyapati Marg Patna

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manjeet Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sumit Giri Vs The State of Bihar

Deepak Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ram Pyare Pandey @ Dinesh Pandey Vs Barababu Pandey

Guddu Pandey @ Binod Pandey Vs Ramashray Choubey

Prabhavti Kumari @ Prabhavti Singh Vs Navneet Kumar Singh @ Dinesh Kumar Singh