First Appeal No. 389 of 1980 dismissed for default. Neither appellant nor respondent appeared despite direct notice; parties reported deceased or untraceable.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA FIRST APPEAL No.389 of 1980
| ====================================================== RAGHUBIR SINGH and ANR ... ... Appellant/s Versus SURESHWAR SINGH and ORS ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== |
|---|
| Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. For the Respondent/s : Mr. ====================================================== |
| CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER |
21 01-12-2025
Direct notices were sent to the appellant.
reported by Office that notice returned with the process server report to the effect that they have died. It is further reported that respondent nos. 1, 2(a), 3 and 4 have also died. As far as respondent nos. 5 and 6 are concerned, their notices have been returned with the server report that “not met”.
has appeared till today. This is an appeal of the year 1980, neither appellant nor respondent are traceable. This Court is left with no option than to dismiss this appeal.
(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
durgesh/-
U
Raghubir Singh
Raghubir Singh (Anr.)
Sureshwar Singh
Ashok Kumar Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
