Disposed

Maya Devi, v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC19 Aug 2025CWJC/9654/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition against withdrawal of consent to operate and establish petitioner's firm by Bihar State Pollution Control Board. Court declined to entertain, citing statutory appeal under Section 31 of Air Act, disposed with liberty to file appeal, condoning delay and granting interim protection.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to avail Section 31 appeal before Board of Revenue; delay condoned; interim stay of impugned letter until appeal; order revives if no appeal filed.

Maya Devi, Vs The State of Bihar — Environment and Pollution | Patna HC (2025)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9654 of 2025

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Maya Devi, W/o Rakesh Kumar, Prop, M/s Shree Vishnu Agro Industries, Village- Nepa, Post- Fatehpur, P.S.- Tekari, District- Gaya.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through Addl. Chief Secretary, Department of Health and Family Affairs, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

¶7

Bihar State Pollution Control Board, through its Member Secretary, Parivesh Bhawan, N.S. B/2, Patliputra Industrial Area, P.O.- Sadakat Ashram, District- Patna.

¶8

Regional Officer, Gaya, Bihar State Pollution Control Board, Parivesh Bhawan, N.S. B/2, Patliputra Industrial Area, P.O.- Sadakat Ashram, District- Patna.

¶9

District Collector, Gaya.

¶10

General Manager, District Industry Centre, Gaya.

¶11

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prabhakar Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Government Advocate (7) Mr. Raju Patel (AC to AG) For the BSPCB : Mr. Kumar Ravish, Advocate ======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER

¶13

5 19-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned

¶14

counsel for the State and learned counsel for Bihar State Pollution Control Board.

¶15

The present writ petition has been filed for the following relief/s:-

¶16

“I. For quashing of the order dated 04.04.2025 issued vide Letter No.344 by Respondent no.2 (annexed as Annexure-P/11) by which consent for operation and establishment of the firm of the petitioner has

¶17

Patna High Court CWJC No.9654 of 2025(5) dt.19-08-2025 2/3

¶18

been withdrawn.

¶19

II. For any other relief/reliefs for which the petitioner is entitled for.”

¶20

Learned counsel appearing for the Bihar State Pollution Control Board raised a preliminary objection and submits that the present writ petition is not maintainable, as there exists a statutory remedy of appeal under Section 31 of the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981. It is further submitted that the State Government has, by notification, conferred the power to hear such appeals upon the Board of Revenue.

¶21

As such, in light of the submissions made, this writ petition is hereby disposed off along with I.A. No.1 of 2025 granting liberty to the petitioner to avail her remedy before the Appellate Authority as mentioned in Section 31 of the Air (Prevention And Control Of Pollution) Act, 1981. It is made clear that the time limit under section 31 is only 30 days, therefore, delay if any in filing the appeal is hereby directed to be condoned and petitioner’s appeal shall be entertained. Further liberty is granted to the petitioner to move for stay before the Appellate Authority. Till then, the letter under challenge shall not be made effective against the petitioner. In the event of

¶22

Patna High Court CWJC No.9654 of 2025(5) dt.19-08-2025 3/3

¶23

failure to avail the remedy of appeal, the order passed by the Bihar State Pollution Control Board, which is under challenge, shall automatically revive.

¶24

(Dr. Anshuman, J)

¶25

Divyansh/-

¶26

Maya Devi, v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Maya Devi, v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Amit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Chandeshwar Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

Ajay Kumar Mishra Vs The State of Bihar

Harendra Pratap Singh,Advocate Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Sri Saryug Mochi @ Saraug Mochi, Vs The State Election Commissioner, State Election Commission (Municipality)

Prabhat Shankar Vs The State of Bihar