Disposed¶33

Ranjit Paswan v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC8 Jul 2025CWJC/7757/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court, CWJC No.7757 of 2015, Rajiv Roy, J, order dt. 08-07-2025: writ petition seeking bar on registration of sale deeds/documents by absconder private respondents (Pawan Paswan, Kunti Devi, Bablu Paswan @ Dablu Paswan) over Tauzi no.8166, Khata no.224, Plot no.1163, Mauza Ranipur Phulwari, Phulwarisharif, Patna, disposed of as a private-party dispute; liberty granted to pursue civil/criminal remedies; references to unfulfilled anticipatory bail deposits of Rs. 34,26,000/- (Cr. Misc. No.21624 of 2014) and Rs. 10,50,000/- (Cr. Mise. No. 21277 of 2014) and Phulwarisharif P.B. Case no.594 of 2013.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to the petitioner to pursue the remedy before the appropriate civil/criminal court; the writ petition otherwise disposed of without issuing the sought direction against registration. ¶33

Ranjit Paswan Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Liberty granted to the petitioner to pursue the remedy before the appropriate civil/criminal court; the writ petition otherwise disposed of without issuing the sought direction against registration.

¶33

Issue for consideration

Whether the concerned respondent authorities should be directed not to register any document/sale deed/deed presented or executed by private respondent nos. 9 to 11 in respect of the specified land (Tauzi no.8166, Khata no.224, Survey Plot no.1163, Mauza Ranipur Phulwari, Patna), given their alleged absconder status and non-compliance with anticipatory bail conditions. +1 more

¶23

Court's answer

On that basis, the writ petition was disposed of, granting the petitioner liberty to pursue the remedy before the appropriate civil/criminal court; no direction restraining registration of documents was issued.

¶33

Ratio / Principle

This Court found force in the learned State Counsel's submission that the matter is a dispute between two private parties for which the petitioner ought to have approached the appropriate authority.

¶30

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Patna High Court (Rajiv Roy, J), Oral Order dated 08-07-2025 in Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7757 of 2015: petitioner Ranjit Paswan sought a direction to registration and police authorities not to register any document/sale deed executed or presented by private respondent nos. 9 to 11 (Pawan Paswan, Kunti Devi, Bablu Paswan @ Dablu Paswan) over land measuring 0.78125 Dismals and 0.859375 Dismals, Tauzi no.8166, Thana no. 35, Ward no. 19, Khata no. 224, Survey Plot no.1163, Mauza Ranipur Phulwari, Mohalla New Ranipur, Phulwarisharif, Patna, on the ground that the private respondents were absconders in Phulwarisharif P.B. Case no.594 of 2013 and had allegedly failed to comply with anticipatory bail conditions imposed by this Court (deposit of Rs. 34,26,000/- by respondent no. 9 in Cr. Misc. No.21624 of 2014; deposit of Rs. 10,50,000/- by respondent nos. 10 and 11 in Cr. Mise. No. 21277 of 2014) and had neither deposited the amounts nor surrendered. Accepting the State counsel's submission that the matter was a dispute between two private parties for which the petitioner should have approached the appropriate authority, the Court disposed of the writ petition granting liberty to pursue the remedy before the appropriate civil/criminal court.

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7757 of 2015

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Ranjit Paswan Son of Shri Ramswaroop Paswan. Resident of Village - Chamangarh, Post - Bariyarpur, Police Station - Naya Rampur, District - Munger.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State Of Bihar

¶7

The Inspector General Registration, Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The District Magistrate, Patna.

¶9

The Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna.

¶10

The District Sub-Registrar, Patna Sadar, Patna.

¶11

The Sub-Registrar, Phulwarisharif, District - Patna.

¶12

The Circle Officer, Phulwarisharif, District - Patna.

¶13

The Officer Incharge, Phulwarisharif Police Station, Patna.

¶14

Pawan Paswan. Son of Late Devi Lal Paswan. Resident of village - Ranipur, Jaihind Colony, P.S.- Phulwarisharif, District - Patna.

¶15

Kunti Devi. Wife of Pawan Paswan. Resident of village - Ranipur, Jaihind Colony, P.S.- Phulwarisharif, District - Patna.

¶16

Bablu Paswan @ Dablu Paswan. Son of Pawan Paswan. Resident of village - Ranipur, Jaihind Colony, P.S.- Phulwarisharif, District - Patna.

¶17

... ... Respondent/s

¶18

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Alok Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr Raj Nandan Prasad, SC-9 ======================================================

¶19

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER

¶20

2 08-07-2025 Heard the parties.

¶21

The present petition has been preferred for the

¶22

following relief/s:

¶23

(i) for a direction to the concerned respondent authorities not to register any document/sale deed/deed of any kind

¶24

Patna High Court CWJC No.7757 of 2015(2) dt.08-07-2025 2/4

¶25

particularly relating to the land measuring 0.78125 Dismals (Five Duhrs) and 0.859375 Dismals (Five and One and half Dhura) pertaining to Tauzi no.8166, Thana no. 35, Ward no. 19, Khata no. 224, Kheara and Survey Plot no.1163 in Mauza Ranipur Phulwari, Mohalla New Ranipur, Survey Thana-Phulwarisharif, District Patna, duly presented or executed by the private respondent nоs.9. to 11 and to hand over them to Police, because they are absconder in Phulwarisharif P.B. Case no.594 of 2013 and the Anticipatory bail of respondent no. 9 has been allowed by this Hon'ble court in Cr, Misc. No.21624 of 2014 subject to the condition that the respondent no.9. shall deposit Rs. 34,26,000/-(Thirty Four Lakhs Twenty Six thousand) while surrendering within a period of four weeks whereas the respondent nos. 10 and 11 have been allowed the Anticipatory ball in Cr. Mise. No. 21277 of 2014 with the condition that

¶26

Patna High Court CWJC No.7757 of 2015(2) dt.08-07-2025 3/4

¶27

the respondent nos, 10 and 11 shall deposit Rs. 10,50,000/-(Ten Lakhs Fifty thousand) in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within six weeks BUT the Private respondent nos 9 to 11 neither have complied with the order of this Hon'ble court by depositing the aforesaid amounts nor have surrendered before the learned court below and the petitioner further prays for issuance of any other appropriate writ or writs/order or orders/ direction or directions which the Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper.

¶28

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for the fraud the respondent nos. 9 to 11 committed with him, a criminal Case has already been lodged which is pending before a competent sessions court.

¶29