Disposed¶20

Surendra Patel urf Timan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC24 Apr 2025CWJC/6707/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna HC disposes CWJC 6707/2025 (Surendra Patel urf Timan Kumar v. State of Bihar et al., 24-04-2025, Purnendu Singh, J.): night-guard pay claim at Shri Navab Higher Secondary School, Sheohar; DEO counter affidavit records Rs.30,500/- paid for 20.04.2010-31.12.2011; petitioner directed to file representation with DEO and District Programme Officer (Establishment), Sheohar if still aggrieved; no statute or precedent cited.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed of; petitioner at liberty to file a representation before the District Education Officer, Sheohar and the District Programme Officer, Establishment, Sheohar for redressal of his grievances if still aggrieved and unpaid. ¶20

Surendra Patel urf Timan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6707 of 2025

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Surendra Patel urf Timan Kumar son of Ram Bhajan Raut, Resident of Ward No. 5, Shevpur, P.S.-Sheohar, District-Sheohar.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through Additional Chief Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The Director, Secondary Education, Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The District Magistrate, Sheohar.

¶9

The District Education Officer, Sheohar.

¶10

The District Program Officer (Establishment), Sheohar.

¶11

The Principal, Shri Navab Higher Secondary School, Sheohar.

¶12

... ... Respondent/s

¶13

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vikas Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Government Pleader (04) ======================================================

¶14

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶15

2 24-04-2025 Heard Mr. Vikas Kumar Jha, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned Government Pleader (04) for the State.

¶16

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of State informs that in para-11 of the counter affidavit, which has been filed on behalf of the District Education Officer, Sheohar, it has been informed that the petitioner has been paid a sum of Rs.30,500/- for the period he worked for i.e. from 20.04.2010 till 31.12.2011, as a night guard, in Shri Navab Higher Secondary School, Sheohar.

¶17

Considering the aforesaid information, I find that

¶18

Patna High Court CWJC No.6707 of 2025(2) dt.24-04-2025 2/2

¶19

the petitioner, if still aggrieved by the action of the respondent/s and has not been paid the required amount then he may file representation before the District Education Officer, Sheohar and the District Programme Officer, Establishment, Sheohar for redressal of his grievances.

¶20

Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed of.

¶21

(Purnendu Singh, J)

¶22

Ashishsingh/-

¶23

Surendra Patel urf Timan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Surendra Patel urf Timan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Suraj Kumar Sah @ Suraj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Karan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Nagendra Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Shabbir Alam Vs The Union of India

Ravindra Kumar Vs The Vice Chancellor

Dr. Shweta Sundram Vs The State of Bihar